Skip to main content

Probability

  • Chapter
Utility and Probability

Part of the book series: The New Palgrave ((NPA))

Abstract

Probability denotes a family of ideas that originally centred on the notion of credibility, or reasonable belief falling short of certainty. There have arisen two quite distinct uses of this group of ideas, namely in the modelling of physical or social processes, and in drawing inferences from, or making decisions on the basis of, inconclusive data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Bayes, T. 1763. An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of changes. In Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability, ed. E.S. Pearson and M.G. Kendall, London: Griffin, 1970; Darien, Conn.: Hafner Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernoulli, J. 1713. Ars conjectandi. Basle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. 1736. The Analogy of Religion. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R. 1950. Logical Foundations of Probability. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daston, R., Heidiberger, M. and Krüger, L. (eds) 1987. The Probabilistic Revolution. 2 vols, Cambridge, Mass.: Bradford Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Finetti, B. 1937. Foresight: its logical laws, its subjective sources. Trans, from the French in Studies in Subjective Probability, ed. H.E. Kyburg Jr. H.E. Smokier, New York: Wiley, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaconis, P. and Freedman, D. 1980a. De Finetti’s generalizations of exchangeability. In Studies in Induction Logic and Probability, Vol. II, ed. R.C. Jeffrey, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaconis, P. and Freedman, D. 1980b. De Finetti’s theorem for Markov chains. Annals of Probability 8(1), 115–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaconis, P. and Zabell, S. 1982. Updating subjective probability. Journal of the American Statistical Association 77, 822–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgeworth, F.Y. 1911. Probability. In The Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th edn, Vol. XXII, New York: Encyclopaedia Britannica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, T. 1973. Theories of Probability. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R.A. 1950. Contributions to Mathematical Statistics. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R.A. 1956. Statistical Methods and Scientific Inference. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huygens, Chr. 1657. Ratiociniis in aleae ludo (Reasoning in a game of change). In C. Huygens, Oeuvres complètes, The Hague: M. Nijhoff, 1888–1950, includes the original Latin, Huygens’ original Dutch, and French translation in Vol. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys, H. 1939. Theory of Probability. 3rd edn, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J.M. 1921. A Treatise on Probability. London: Macmillan; New York: Harper & Row, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolmogorov, A.N. 1933. Foundations of the Theory of Probability. Trans, from the German, New York: Chelsea, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laplace, P.S. de 1795. A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities. Trans, from the French, New York: Dover, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maistrov, L.E. 1967. Probability Theory: A Historical Sketch. Trans, from the Russian, New York: Academic Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neyman, J. and Pearson, E.S. 1967. Joint Statistical Papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, CS. 1878, 1910. Collected Papers of Charlges Sanders Peirce. Ed. C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poisson, S.–D. 1837. Recherches sur la probabilité des jugements en matière criminelle et en matière civile. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R. 1959. The propensity interpretation of probability. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10, May, 25–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F.P. 1926. Truth and probability. In Foundations: Essays by F.P. Ramsey, ed. D.H. Mellor, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1978; New York: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, H. 1949. The Theory of Probability. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L.J. 1954. The Foundations of Statistics. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, S. 1986. The History of Statistics: The Measurement of Uncertainty before 1900. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P. 1973. New foundations of objective probability: axioms for propensities. In Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Vol. IV, ed. P. Suppes et al., Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Mises, R. 1928. Probabilit, Statistics and Truth. Trans, from the German, London: Allen & Unwin, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O. 1944. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 3rd edn, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

John Eatwell Murray Milgate Peter Newman

Copyright information

© 1990 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hacking, I. (1990). Probability. In: Eatwell, J., Milgate, M., Newman, P. (eds) Utility and Probability. The New Palgrave. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20568-4_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics