Advertisement

Expected Utility and Mathematical Expectation

  • David Schmeidler
  • Peter Wakker
Part of the The New Palgrave book series (NPA)

Abstract

1. Expected utility theory deals with choosing among acts where the decisionmaker does not know for sure which consequence will result from a chosen act. When faced with several acts, the decision–maker will choose the one with the highest ‘expected utility’, where the expected utility of an act is the sum of the products of probability and utility over all possible consequences.

Keywords

Preference Relation Mathematical Expectation Utility Theory Expect Utility Theory Expected Utility Maximization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Anscombe, F.J. and Aumann, R.J. 1963. A definition of subjective probability. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 34, 199–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernoulli, D. 1738. Specimen theoriae novae de mensura sortis. Commentarii Academiae Scientiarum Imperialis Petropolitanae 5,175–92. Translated into English by L. Sommer (1954) as: Exposition of a new theory on the measurement of risk, Econometrica 12, 23–36;Google Scholar
  3. or in Utility Theory: A Book of Readings, ed. A.N. Page, New York: Wiley, 1986.Google Scholar
  4. Choquet, G. 1953–4. Theory of capacities. Annales de l’Institut Fourier (Grenoble), 131–295.Google Scholar
  5. de Finetti, B. 1931. Sul significato soggettivo delia probabilita. Fundamenta Mathematicae 17, 298–329.Google Scholar
  6. de Finetti, B. 1937. La prévision: ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives. Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré 7, 1–68. Translated into English in Studies in Subjective Probability, ed. H.E. Kyburg and H.E. Smokier, 1964, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Ellsberg, D. 1961. Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics 75, 643–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fishburn, P.C. 1970. Utility Theory for Decision Making. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Gilboa, I. 1986. Non–additive probability measures and their applications in expected utility theory. PhD Thesis submitted to Tel Aviv University.Google Scholar
  10. Herstein, I.N. and Milnor, J. 1953. An axiomatic approach to measurable utility. Econometrica 21, 291–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Karni, E. 1985. Decision–Making under Uncertainty : The Case of State–Dependent Preferences. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kolmogorov, A.N. 1933. Grundbegriffe der Wahrscheinlichkeitrechnung. Berlin. Translated into English by Nathan Morrison (1950,2nd edn, 1956), New York: Chelsea Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  13. Loeve, M. 1963. Probability Theory. 3rd edn, Princeton: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
  14. Ramsey, F.P. 1931. Truth and probability. In The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays, ed. R.B. Braithwaite, New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
  15. Savage, L.J. 1954. The Foundations of Statistics. New York: Wiley, 2nd edn, 1972.Google Scholar
  16. Schmeidler, D. 1984. Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. CARESS, University of Pennsylvania and IMA University of Minnesota, mimeo.Google Scholar
  17. Wald, A. 1951. Statistical Decision Functions. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  18. Wakker, P.P. 1986. Representations of choice situations. PhD thesis, University of Tilburg, Department of Economics.Google Scholar
  19. von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O. 1947. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. 2nd edn, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Schmeidler
  • Peter Wakker

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations