Abstract
A ‘literary life’ of Pope might almost be thought a tautology — for Pope had little life that was not literary, and few lives have been so completely fulfilled in terms of literature. It is not often given to a poet both to know what he can do, and then to do it. Pope was one of the few; and in a small way, that has been his misfortune, for there is something very irritating to the human spirit in such a spectacle. The Romantic poets, said Byron, ostracised Pope for the same reason the Athenians gave for their ostracism of Aristides — they were ‘tired of hearing him always called “The Just”’. Pope has been disliked for his comprehensiveness, his formal perfection and simply for seeming to embody the eighteenth century. In a minor key, many students have a version of the Romantic response, when they recognise the polish of the style and suspect how many decisions have gone into its brilliance — but resent it nonetheless, for it seems to have no need of them: it leaves them without anything to add.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1990 Felicity Rosslyn
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rosslyn, F. (1990). Introduction. In: Alexander Pope. Literary Lives. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20564-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20564-6_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-42691-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-20564-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)