Advertisement

Abstract

There are many kinds of narrative, and many kinds of novel. But critics none the less continue to take the realist novel as the norm for fiction, and to assimilate other forms to it. Many of them still understand fiction in terms that have been developed in response to the realist novel, and their reading habits are still largely those fostered by the realist novel. As a result, forms of narrative which actually ask to be understood in quite different terms are frequently misread. More than twenty years ago, in The Nature of Narrative, Scholes and Kellogg argued that ‘the tendency to apply the standards of nineteenth-century realism to all fiction naturally has disadvantages for our understanding of every other kind of narrative’.1 Fresh critical approaches to the novel have emerged since then, and various critics have begun to free some of the ‘other kinds of narrative‘ from the alien constraints too often imposed on them.2 But even so, a glance at much of the most recent work on Richardson or Joyce, for instance, suggests that the old, well-established modes of reading are still dominant. In novels — and even anti-novels — where elements of the mimetic persist, most readers seem inclined to understand the text in mimetic terms, or to move from the basis of a mimetic reading to other forms of reading. It is still unusual to find a narrative text approached primarily in terms of its intrinsic logic; as, firstly, an activity of mind, rather than a set of representations.

Keywords

Literary Discourse Plural Subject Narrative Coherence Narrative Discourse Rhetorical Figure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Robert Scholes and Robert Kellogg, The Nature of Narrative (New York, 1966) p. 6.Google Scholar
  2. 5.
    Frank Kermode, Essays on Fiction 1971–82 (London, 1983) p. 74.Google Scholar
  3. 7.
    Samuel Beckett, Disjecta: Miscellaneous Writings and a Dramatic Frag-ment ed. with a foreword by Ruby Cohn (London, 1983) p. 27.Google Scholar
  4. 9.
    John Henry Newman, ‘Poetry, with Reference to Aristotle‘s Poetics‘ in Essays Critical and Historical 2 vols (London, 1887) vol. 1, p. 9.Google Scholar
  5. 10.
    Henry James, Preface to The Tragic Muse The Art of the Novel: Critical Prefaces by Henry James, introd. R. P. Blackmur (New York, 1934) p. 84.Google Scholar
  6. 11.
    Frank Kermode, The Genesis of Secrecy: On the Interpretation of Narrative (London, 1979) p. 53.Google Scholar
  7. 12.
    Wayne C. Booth, The Rhetoric of Fiction, 2nd edn (Chicago, Ill., 1983) p. 224, pp. 354–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 18.
    Roland Barthes, Le Plaisir du Texte (Paris, 1973) p. 14, p. 19, p. 18; my translation.Google Scholar
  9. 40.
    James, Preface to The Tragic Muse in The Art of the Novel p. 84Google Scholar
  10. Percy Lubbock, The Craft of Fiction (London, 1921) p. 41, p. 206, p. 209.Google Scholar
  11. 41.
    Barbara Hardy, The Appropriate Form: An Essay on the Novel (London, 1964) p. 161.Google Scholar
  12. 47.
    Henry Fielding, The History of Tom Jones, A Foundling ed. Fredson Bowers, with an introduction and commentary by Martin Battestin, 2 vols (Oxford, 1974) vol. 1, p. 406.Google Scholar
  13. 49.
    David Lodge, Language of Fiction: Essays in Criticism and Verbal Analysis of the English Novel (London, 1966) p. 69.Google Scholar
  14. 57.
    Tzvetan Todorov, Introduction à la Littérature Fantastique (Paris, 1970) pp. 31–5, 41–5.Google Scholar
  15. 58.
    Christine Brooke-Rose, A Rhetoric of the Unreal: Studies in Narrative and Structure, Especially of the Fantastic (Cambridge, 1981) p. 227.Google Scholar
  16. 59.
    Umberto Eco, The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts (London, 1979) p. 209.Google Scholar
  17. 67.
    Roland Barthes, ‘Introduction to the Structural Analysis of Narratives‘, in Image, Music, Text essays selected and tr. Stephen Heath (Glasgow, 1977) p. 111.Google Scholar
  18. 69.
    Michel Foucault, ‘The Order of Discourse’, in Untying the Text: A Post-Structuralist Reader ed. and introd. Robert Young (London, 1981) p. 58.Google Scholar
  19. 72.
    See Julia Kristeva, Revolution in Poetic Language, tr. Margaret Waller, introd. Leon S. Roudiez (New York, 1984) pp. 59–60.Google Scholar
  20. 78.
    Gérard Genette, Figures of Literary Discourse tr. Alan Sheridan, with an introduction by Marie-Rose Logan (Oxford, 1982) p. 16.Google Scholar
  21. 86.
    Marcel Proust, ‘About Flaubert‘s Style’, in A Selection from his Miscellaneous Writings chosen and tr. Gerard Hopkins (London, 1948) p. 224, p. 226, p. 229.Google Scholar
  22. 89.
    Frank Kermode, The Sense of an Ending: Studies in the Theory of Fiction (Oxford, 1967) p. 151; Forster, Aspects of the Novel p. 89.Google Scholar
  23. 90.
    James Joyce, Critical Writings ed. Ellsworth Mason and Richard Eilmann (London, 1959) p. 96.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Andrew Gibson 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew Gibson
    • 1
  1. 1.Royal Holloway and Bedford New CollegeUniversity of LondonUK

Personalised recommendations