Skip to main content

Achievement in the Analytical Tradition in Sociology

  • Chapter
What Has Sociology Achieved?
  • 29 Accesses

Abstract

When sociology was founded as an academic discipline, the spirit of the time was predominantly positivist. Studying society in those days meant searching for scientific laws that would enable man to predict future events in a reliable and precise way, thereby enhancing human capacity to intervene in social reality at will. The guiding image of this tradition has been aptly formulated by Comte as ‘savoir pour prévoir, prévoir afin de pouvoir’. This guiding image implicitly contains criteria for identifying achievement in the early years of the tradition: causal understanding of the phenomena to be manipulated, prediction based upon causal laws, intervention based upon causal understanding and prediction. We are talking about sociologists who wanted knowledge primarily in order to be able to apply it to the solution of practical problems. We are also talking about the mainstream tradition in sociology.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andrade, R. d’ (1986) ‘Three Scientific World Views and the Covering Law Model’ in D. W. Fiske and R. A. Shweder (eds), Metatheory in Social Science (Chicago: University of Chicago Press) pp. 19–41.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Axelrod, R. (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation (New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Becker, H. A. (1981) ‘Voortgang en Vooruitgang in de Sociologie’, in Mens en Maatschappij, vol. 2, pp. 118–53. [Achievement and Progress in Sociology]

    Google Scholar 

  4. Becker, H. A. (1986) ‘Tegenstellingen en Vooruitgang in de Sociologie’, in H. A. Becker and P. Glasbergen (eds), Sociologie en Verzorgingsstaat (The Hague: VUGA). [Controversies and Progress in Sociology]

    Google Scholar 

  5. Becker, H. A. (1988) ‘Generationen, Handlungsspielraume und Generationspolitik’, in A. Weyman (ed.), Handlungspielraume (Stuttgart: Enke).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Blalock, H. M. (1980) Social Theory and Social Research (Glencoe/Ill: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Blau, P. (1963) The Dynamics of Bureaucracy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Blau, P. and Duncan, O. D. (1967) The American Occupational Structure (New York: Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Blau, P. and Schoenherr, P. A. (1971) The Structure of Organizations (New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Blau, P. and Schwartz, J. E. (1984) Crosscutting Social Circles: Testing a Macrostructural Theory of Intergroup Relations (Orlando: Academic Press).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Biossfeld, H. P. (1986) ‘Career Opportunities in the Federal Republic of Germany: A Dynamic Approach to the Study of Life-Course, Cohort and Period Effects’, European Sociological Review, vol. 2, pp. 208–25.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bottomore, T., Nowak, S. and Sokolowska, M. (eds) (1982) Sociology: The State of the Art (Beverly Hills: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Boudon, R. (1984) La place du désordre (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Boudon, R. (1986) Theories of Social Change: A Critical Approach (Cambridge: Polity Press). [Translation of La place du désordre]

    Google Scholar 

  15. Braverman, H. (1974) Labor and Monopoly Capital (New York: Monthly Review Press).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bryant, C. G. A. (1985a) Positivism in Social Theory and Research (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bryant, C. G. A. (1985b) After Postivism? (Salford: University of Salford).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Coleman, J. S. et al. (1986) Equality of Educational Opportunities (Washington: Government Printing Office).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Converse, P. E. (1986) ‘Generalization and the Social Psychology of “Other Worlds”’, in Fiske and Shweder (1986), ch. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dahl, R. A. and Tufte, E. R. (1974) Size and Democracy (London: OUP).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Deutsch, K., Markovits, A. S. and Platt, J. (eds) (1987) Advances in the Social Sciences 1900–1980 (Lanham: University Press of America).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Elster, J. (1979) Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in Rationality and Irrationality (Cambridge: CUP).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Elster, J. (1983) Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality (Cambridge: CUP).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Elster, J. (ed.) (1986) Rational Choice (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fiske, D. W. and Shweder, R. A. (eds) (1986) Metatheory in Social Science: Pluralisms and Subjectivities (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gadourek, I. (1982) Social Change as Redefinition of Roles (Assen: Van Gorkum).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gadourek, I. (1986) De Moeizame Weg naar de Verklaring van de Maatscheppelijke Verschijnselen (Amsterdam: Noord-Hollandsche Uitgevers Maatschappij). [The Stony Road Towards Explanation of Social Phenomena]

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gadourek, I. (1988) De wederzijdse Verhouding van de voornaamste Gedragsen Maatschappijwetenschappen, de veranderende sociologische visie (Amsterdam: Noord-Hollandsche Uitgevers Maatschappij). [The Relationship Between the Principal Behavioural and Social Sciences]

    Google Scholar 

  29. Goldthorpe, J. H. (1980) Social Mobility and Class Structure in Modern Britain (Oxford: OUP).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Goldthorpe, J. H., Lockwood, D., Bechhofer, F. and Platt, J. (1969–70) The Affluent Worker, 3 vols (Cambridge: CUP).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hardin, R. (1982) Collective Action (Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Heath, A. (1976) Rational Choice and Social Exchange (Cambridge: CUP).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hempel, C. G. (1942) ‘The Function of General Laws in History’, Journal of Philosophy, vol. 39, pp. 35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hondrich, K. O. (1976) ‘Entwicklungslinien und Moglichkeiten des Theorienvergleichs’, in M. R. Lepsius (ed.), Zwischenbilanz der Soziologie (Stuttgart: Enke Verlag) pp. 14–36.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hörning, K. H. (1971) Der ‘neue’ Arbeiter, zum Wandel sozialer Schichtstrukturen (Frankfurt: Fischer).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kaufmann, F. X., Majone, G. and Ostrom, V. (eds) (1986) Guidance, Control and Evaluation in the Public Sector (Berlin: de Gruyter).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kern, H. and Schumann, M. (1970) Industriearbeit und Arbeiterbewusstsein, 2 vols (Frankfurt: Verlag C. H. Beck).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kern, H. and Schumann, M. (1984) Das Ende der Arbeitsteilung? (Munich: Beck).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kuhn, T. S. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lindenberg, S. (1985a) ‘An Assessment of the New Political Economy: Its Potential for the Social Sciences and for Sociology in Particular’, Sociological Theory, vol. 3, pp. 99–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Lindenberg, S. (1985b) ‘Rational Choice and Sociological Theory’, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, vol 141, pp. 144–55.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mallet, S. (1972) Die neue Arbeiterklasse (Berlin: Neuwied). [La nouvelle classe ouvrière] Margolis, H. (1982) Selfishness, Altruism and Rationality: A Theory of Social Choice (Cambridge: CUP).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Menzies, K. (1982) Sociological Theory in Use (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Mintzberg, H. (1979) The Structuring of Organizations (Englewood Cliffs/NJ: Prentice-Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Opp, K. D. (1985) ‘Sociology and Economic Man’, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, vol. 141, pp. 213–43.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Outhwaite, W. (1987) New Philosophies of Social Science: Realism, Hermeneutics and Critical Theory (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Raub, W. (1984) ‘Rationale Akteure, Institutionelle Regelungen und Interdependenzen’ (unpublished dissertation, University of Utrecht).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Roethlisberger, F. J. and Dickson, W. I. (1939) Management and the Worker (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Rogers, E. M. (1983) Diffusion of Innovations (Glencoe/Ill: The Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Sahner, H. (1982) Theorie und Forschung, zur paradigmatischen Struktur der westdeutschen Soziologie und zu ihrem Einfluss auf die Forschung (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Short, J. F. (ed.) (1981) The State of Sociology: Problems and Prospects (Beverly Hills: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Soziologische Revue (1986) special issue (no. 1) on Das Ende der Arbeitsteilung? by Kern and Schumann (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Wells, R. H. and Picou, P. S. (1981) American Sociology: Theoretical and Methodological Structure (Washington: University Press of America).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1990 Christopher G. A. Bryant and Henk A. Becker

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Becker, H.A. (1990). Achievement in the Analytical Tradition in Sociology. In: Bryant, C.G.A., Becker, H.A. (eds) What Has Sociology Achieved?. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20518-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics