Skip to main content

Crawling from the Wreckage: The Labour Process and the Politics of Production

  • Chapter
Labour Process Theory

Part of the book series: Studies in the Labour Process ((SLP))

Abstract

Considerable uncertainty exists concerning the intellectual validity and purpose of ‘labour process theory’. It is now common ground that such theory is in crisis. John Storey (1985a: 194) sums up what he considers to be the general state of play:

It is not perhaps an exaggeration to claim that the labour process bandwagon has run into the sand. Indeed the catalogue of amendments and criticisms attaching to labour process theory has led a number of critics to call for little less than the abandonment of labour process theory. It has served a useful purpose but it is now holed and patched beyond repair.

Thanks to Peter Armstrong, Jim McGoldrick, David Knights and Trevor Hooper for comments on the earlier draft of the paper. Responsibility remains my own.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baxendall, R. et al. (1976) ‘The Working Class Has Two Sexes’, Monthly Review, vol. 28, no. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braverman, H. (1974) Labor and Monopoly Capital (New York: Monthly Review Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Braverman, H. (1976) ‘Two Comments’, Monthly Review, vol. 28, no. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brighton Labour Process Group (1977) ‘The Capitalist Labour Process’, Capital and Class, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, M. (1979) Manufacturing Consent (University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, M. (1985) The Politics of Production (London: Verso).

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D. (1985) ‘Just Hang on a Minute There: a Rejection of André Gorz’s Farewell to the Working Class’, Capital and Class, 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Child, J. (1985) ‘Managerial Strategies, New Technology and the Labour Process’, in D. Knights et al. (eds), Job Redesign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavendish, R. (1982) Women on the Line (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S. and W. Higgins (1985) From Critical Theory to Routine Practice in Organisational Analysis (unpublished paper).

    Google Scholar 

  • Collinson, D. and D. Knights (1986) ‘Men Only: Theories and Practices of Job Segregation in Insurance’, in D. Knights and H. Willmott, Gender and the Labour Process (Aldershot: Gower).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, R. (1985) ‘Automation, Management Strategies and Labour Process Change’, in D. Knights et al. (eds), Job Redesign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cousins, C. (1986) ‘Labour Processes in the State Service Sector’, in D. Knights and H. Willmott (eds), Managing the Labour Process (Aldershot: Gowerf).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressey, P. and J. MacInnes (1980) ‘Industrial Democracy and the Control of Labour’, Capital and Class, 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dent, M. (1986) ‘Autonomy and the Medical Profession: Medical Audit and Control’ (UMIST-Aston paper).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dow, G., S. Clegg and P. Boreham (1986) ‘The Institutional Management of Class Politics: Beyond the Labour Process and Corporatist debates’, in D. Knights and H. C. Willmott (eds.) Managing the Labour Process.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P. K. (1983) Control, Compliance and Conflict: Analysing Variations in the Capitalist Labour Process (SSRC Industrial Relations Research Unit).

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, R. (1979) Contested Terrain (London: Heinemann).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenreich, B. and J. Ehrenreich (1976) ‘Work and Consciousness’, Monthly Review, vol. 28. no. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, A. (1977) Industry and Labour (London: Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gorz, A. (1982) Farewell to the Working Class (London: Pluto).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G. (1982) Capitalism, Value and Exploitation (Oxford: Martin Robertson).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G. (1984) The Democratic Economy (Harmondsworth: Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. (1985) ‘Management’s Redesign of Work’, in D. Knights et al. (eds) Job Redesign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knights, D., H. Wilmott and D. Collinson (eds) (1985) Job Redesign (Aldershot: Gower).

    Google Scholar 

  • Knights, D. and J. Roberts (1983) ‘Understanding the Theory and Practice of Management Control’, Employee Relations, vol. 5, no. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, P. (1984) Personality and Ideology (London: Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Littler, C. (1982) The Development of the Labour Process in Capitalist Societies (London: Heinemann).

    Google Scholar 

  • Littler, C. (1985) ‘Taylorism, Fordism and Job Design’, in D. Knights et al. (eds), Job Redesign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littler, C. and G. Salaman (1982) ‘Bravermania and Beyond: Recent Theories of the Labour Process’, Sociology, vol. 16, no. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. and D. Hooper (1986) ‘Corporate Strategy and Control’ (UMIST-Aston paper).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, K. and A. Sayer (1984) A ‘Modern’ Industry in a ‘Mature’ Region: The Remaking of Management-Labour Relations (Working Paper 39, Urban and Regional Studies, University of Sussex).

    Google Scholar 

  • Neimark, M. and T. Tinker (1986) ‘On Rediscovering Marx: Dissolving Agency-Structure in Dialectical Unity’ (UMIST-Aston paper).

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, D. F. (1979) ‘Social Choice in Machine Design: The Case of Automatically Controlled Machine Tools’, in A. Zimbalist (ed.), Case Studies on the Labor Process (New York: Monthly Review Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Poliert, A. (1981) Girls, Wives, Factory Lives (London: Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay, H. (1985) ‘What is Participation For?’ in D. Knights et al. (eds), Job Redesign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, M. and B. Jones (1985) ‘Managerial Strategy and Trade Union Responses in Work Reorganisation Schemes at Establishment Level’, in D. Knights et al. (eds), Job Redesign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey, J. (1985a) ‘The Means of Management Control’, Sociology, vol. 19, no. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey, J. (1985b) ‘Management Control as a Bridging Concept’, Journal of Management Studies, vol. 22, no. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. (1983) The Nature of Work: An Introduction to Debates on the Labour Process (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. and E. Bannon (1985) Working the System: The Shop Floor and New Technology (London: Pluto).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, J. (1982) The Unequal Struggle: British Socialism and the Capitalist Enterprise (London: Methuen).

    Google Scholar 

  • Westwood, S. (1984) All Day Every Day (London: Pluto).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, B. (1983) The Shopfloor Politics of New Technology (London: Heinemann).

    Google Scholar 

  • Willmott, H. (1984) ‘Images and Ideals of Management Work’ Journal of Management Studies, vol. 21, no. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, E. O. (1985) Classes (London: Verso).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1990 David Knights and Hugh Willmott

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thompson, P. (1990). Crawling from the Wreckage: The Labour Process and the Politics of Production. In: Knights, D., Willmott, H. (eds) Labour Process Theory. Studies in the Labour Process. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20466-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics