Skip to main content

The Labour Process Debate: A Theoretical Review 1974–88

  • Chapter
Labour Process Theory

Part of the book series: Studies in the Labour Process ((SLP))

Abstract

Braverman’s Labor and Monopoly Capital was published in 1974. It stimulated a widespread debate in Britain, which gathered pace through the latter part of the 1970s. This debate has extended and diversified, so that now there are three major overlapping currents:

  1. (1)

    Questions about deskilling and the attempt to construct a satisfactory model of skill changes.

  2. (2)

    Questions about labour markets and the attempt to construct a satisfactory model of capitalist labour markets.

  3. (3)

    Questions about managerial strategy and control.

This leaves out of account various other strands of the debate; nevertheless the three areas above seem to me to be the core areas and to help to define the parameters of the debate. In this chapter I intend to focus on the third area: questions about managerial strategy and control; this is the area of research which has shown the most theoretical development in the past few years and which has generated heated controversy (e.g. Storey, 1985; Friedman, 1987).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anthony, P. D. (1977) The Conduct of Industrial Relations, (London: IPM)

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Council of Trade Unions (1981), Report on ACTU Federal Unions Conference on Technological Change, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, P. (1984) ‘Competition between Organizational Professions and the Evaluation of Management Control Strategies’, in K. Thompson, Work, Employment and Unemployment (Milton Keynes: Open University Press, pp. 97–120).

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Science and Technology Council (1982) Technological Change and Employment (Canberra: AGPS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldamus, W. (1961) Efficiency and Effort (London: Tavistock).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldamus, W. (1976) The Structure of Sociological Inference (London: Martin Robertson).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M. (1972) Changing Technology and Manpower Requirements in the Engineering Industry (Brighton: Sussex University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, I. and J. Lloyd (1983) New Technology and Industrial Change: The Impact of the Scientific-Technical Revolution on Labour and Industry (London: Kogan Page).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berle, A. A. and G. C. Means (1932) The Modern Corporation and Private Property (New York: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, P., R. Coombs and K. Green (1985) Technology, Economic Growth and the Labour Process (London: Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. and R. A. Schoenherr (1971) The Structure of Organization (New York: Basic).

    Google Scholar 

  • Braverman, H. (1974) Labor and Monopoly Capital (New York: Monthly Review Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, M. and V. Taylor (1986) Managing Labour? (New York: McGraw Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. (1984) ‘Work, Past, Present and Future’, in K. Thompson (ed.), Work, Employment and Unemployment (Milton Keynes: Open University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruland, T. (1982) ‘Industrial Conflict as a Source of Technical Innovation: Three Cases’, Economy and Society, 11: 91–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, M. (1979) Manufacturing Consent (University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, M. (1983) ‘Between the Labour Process and the State: Changing Face of Factory Regimes under Advanced Capitalism’, American Sociological Review, 48: 587–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, M. (1985) The Politics of Production (London: Verso).

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, I. G. (1983) Recent Marxist Studies of the Capitalist Labour Process: The Limitations of the Theme of Capitalist Control (Master’s Thesis, LaTrobe University, Australia).

    Google Scholar 

  • Child, J. (1985) ‘Managerial Strategies, New Technology, and the Labour Process,’ in D. Knights, H. Willmott and D. Collinson (eds), Job Design (Aldershot: Gower) pp. 107–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clawson, D. (1980) Bureaucracy and the Labor Process — the Transformation of US Industry1860–1920 (New York: Monthly Review Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, P. (1985) ‘Company Time: Management Ideology and the Labour Processes, 1940–1960’, Labour History, May 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1981) ‘Managers and Machinery: an Analysis of the Rise of Factory Production’, Australian Economic Papers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collinson, D. (1983) Managing the Shopfloor (mimeo, Manchester University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, M. (1979) Architect or Bee: The Human Technology Relationship (Slough: Langley Technical Services).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, M. (1984) Technology, Unions and Human Needs (Geneva: International Metalworkers Federation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, R. (1985) ‘Automation, Management Strategies and the Labour Process’, in D. Knights et al. (eds) Job Redesign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressey, P. and J. MacInnes (1980) ‘Voting for Ford: Industrial Democracy and the Control of Labour’, Capital and Class, 11: 5–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crompton, R. and G. Jones (1984) White-collar Proletariat: Deskilling and Gender in Clerical Work (London: Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • CSS (1981) New Technology: Society, Employment and Skill (London: CSS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtain, R. (1983) Work and Unemployment in Comparative Perspective: A Critique of Braverman (mimeo, Bureau of Labour Market Research, Canberra, Australia).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deery, S. and R. Mitchell (1986) ‘Industrial Relations: the New Management Offensive’, Arena, 77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Science and Technology (1984) Conference Proceedings and Report (National Technology Conference, AGPS, Canberra).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Science and Technology (1984) Social Implications of Technological Change (Canberra).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Science and Technology (1984) National Technology Strategy (Discussion draft, Canberra).

    Google Scholar 

  • Doeringer, P. and M. Piore (1971) Internal Labour Markets and Manpower Analysis (Lexington, Mass. D. C. Heath Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dore, R. P. (1973) British Factory — Japanese Factory (London: Allen & Unwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Boff, R. B. and E. S. Herman (1980) ‘Alfred Chandler’s New Business History: a Review’, Politics and Society, 10,1, 87–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunkerley, D. (1980) ‘Technological Change and Work: Upgrading or Deskilling’, in P. Boreham and G. Dow, Work and Inequality, vol. 2 (Melbourne: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P. K. (1983) Control, Compliance and Conflict: Analysing Variations in the Capitalist Labour Process (mimeo, paper presented at the 1st UMIST-Labour Process Conference, Manchester).

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P. K. (1986) Conflict at Work (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P. K. (1987) Managing the Factory (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P. K. and H. Scullion (1982) The Social Organization of Industrial Conflict (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, R. (1979) Contested Terrain (London: Heinemann).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellul, J. D. (1980) The Technological System (New York: Continuum).

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1961) A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. (1982) Negotiating Technological Change (Brussels: European Trade Union Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, A. (1974) Beyond Contract: Work, Power and Trust Relations (Faber & Faber).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, A. (1977) Industry and Labour (London: Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, A. (1982) Management Strategies, Market Conditions and the Labour Process (mimeo, University of Bristol).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, A. (1985) Managerial Strategies, Activities, Techniques and Technology: Towards a Complex Theory of the Labour Process (mimeo, paper presented to the Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Accounting Conference, University of Manchester).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, A. (1987) ‘The Means of Management Control and Labour Process Theory: A Critical Note on Storey’, Sociology, 21, no. 2: 287–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartman, D. (1986) Auto Slavery: The Labour Process in the American Automobile Industry1987–1950 (New Brunswick, NJ, Rutgers University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldthorpe, J. H., D. Lockwood, F. Bechhofer and J. Platt (1969) The Affluent Worker (Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D. M. (1976) ‘Capitalist Efficiency and Socialist Efficiency’. Monthly Review, 28, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D., R. Edwards and M. Reich (1982) Segmented Work, Divided Workers: the Historical Transformation of Labor in the United States (Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorz, A. (1964) ‘Strategy for Labour’ in B. Horvat et al (eds), Self Governing Socialism, vol. 2 (New York: International Arts and Sciences Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorz, A. (1982) Farewell to the Working Class: An Essay on Post-industrial Socialism (London: Pluto).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hales, M. (1980) Living Thinkwork (London: CSE Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, W. and N. Apple (1983) ‘How Limited is Reformism?’, Theory and Society, 12: 603–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hingley, L. (1984) Development of a National Technology Strategy (Address to ANZAAS symposium, 54th ANZAAS Congress, Canberra).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, J. (1973) The First Shop Stewards Movement (London: Allen & Unwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, R. (1987) ‘Strategy or Structure? Capital, Labour and Control’. Work, Employment and Society, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkson, K. and P. Cammock (1984) ‘Labour Process Theory and the Chain System in the New Zealand Meatworks’, New Zealand Journal of Industrial Relations, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Barry (1982) Sleepers, Wake! Technology and the Future of Work (Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Bryn (1982) ‘Destruction or Redistribution of Engineering Skills; the Case of Numerical Control’, in S. Wood (ed.), The Degradation of Work (London: Hutchinson).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, H. (1960) The Forest Ranger: A Study in Administrative Behaviour (Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, H. (1973) Administrative Feedback (Washington: The Brookings Institution).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. (1982) Scientific Management, Job Redesign, and Work Performance (London: Academic Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Knights, D., H. Willmott and D. Collinson (eds) (1985) Job Redesign: Critical Perspectives on the Labour Process (Aldershot: Gower).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusterer, K. (1978) Knowhow on the Job: The Important Working Knowledge of “Unskilled” Workers (Boulder, Col. Westview).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, C. (1985) ‘White-collar Workers in the Labour Process; the Case of the Federal Republic of Germany’, Sociological Review, 23, no. 2: 298–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazonick, W. (1981) ‘Production Relations, Labour Productivity, and Choice of Technique: British and US Cotton Spinning’, Journal of Economic History, vol. XLI, no. 3: 491–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazonick, W. (1979) ‘Industrial Relations and Technical Change; the Case of the Self-acting Mule’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, no. 3: 231–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazonick, W. (1981) ‘Factor Costs and the Diffusion of Ring Spinning in Britain prior to World War 1’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 96: 89–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, H. and J. Shapiro (1983) The Son of the Revolution (London: Chatto & Windus).

    Google Scholar 

  • Littler, C. R. (1974) Research Report on Hayward Tyler (mimeo, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Littler, C. R. (1982) The Development of the Labour Process in Capitalist Societies: A Comparative Study of the Transformation of Work Organization in Britain, Japan and the USA (London: Heinemann).

    Google Scholar 

  • Littler, C. R. and G. Salaman (1982) ‘Bravermania and Beyond: Recent Theories of the Labour Process’, Sociology, vol. 16, no. 2: 251–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littler, C. R. and G. Salaman (1984) Class at Work: The Design, Allocation and Control of Jobs (London: Batsford Academic).

    Google Scholar 

  • Littler, C. R. and G. P. Palmer (1986) ‘Communist and Capitalist Trade Unionism: Comparisons and Contrasts’, in A. Pravda and B. Ruble (eds), Trade Unions in Communist States (London: Allen & Unwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, D. (1960) The Human Side of the Enterprise (New York: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • MacInnes, J. (1983) The Labour Process Debate and the Commodity Status of Labour: Some Problems (mimeo, paper presented at the 1st Labour Process Conference, Manchester).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, D. (1984) ‘Marx and the Machine’, Technology and Culture, vol. 25, no. 3: 473–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, B. (1981) ‘Technological Change and the Trade Unions’, in Evans, Reeves and Malbon (eds), Labor Essays 1981 (Melbourne: Drummond).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marglin, S. (1978) ‘What Do Bosses Do?: The Origins and Functions of Hierarchy in Capitalist Production’, in A. Gorz (ed.) The Division of Labour: The Labour Process and Class Struggle in Modern Capitalism (Brighton: Harvester Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Markey, R. (1984) ‘Unions and Planning for Technological Change in Australia’, Australian Quarterly, vol. 56, no. 1: 53–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, D., T. Morris, P. Willman and S. Wood (1985) The Car Industry: Labour Relations and Industrial Adjustment (London: Tavistock).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, A., M. Hackman and D. Miller (1981) Workplace Relations in the Engineering Industry in the U.K. and the Federal Republic of Germany (Anglo-German Foundation for the Study of Industrial Society).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1970) Capital: A Critical Analysis of Capitalist Production, vol. 1 (London: Lawrence & Wishart).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1976 edn) Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, vol. 1 (Hardmondsworth: Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, J. (1985) Technology, Trade Unions and the Labour Process (Working Papers in the Social Studies of Science, Department of Humanities, Deakin University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Melling, J. (1984) ‘Review Essay: Enterprise and Emancipation in Capitalist Industry’, Business History.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1978) ‘Pattern in Strategy Formation’, Management Science, 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montmollin, M. and O. Pastre (1984) Le Taylorisme (Paris: Editions La Découverte).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. (1983) Japanese Workers and the Struggle for Power, 1945–47 (Madison, WI: Wisconsin University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, W.(Jr) (1981) ‘Mechanization and Work in the American Shoe Industry — Lynn, Massachusetts, 1852–1883’, Journal of Economic History, vol. XLI, no. 1: 59–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas, I., M. Warner, A. Sorge and G. Hartmann (1983) ‘Computerised Machine Tools Manpower Training and Skill Polarisation; a Study of British and West German Manufacturing Firms’, in G. Winch, Information Technology in Manufacturing Processes (London: Rossendale).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, T. (1969) Ownership, Control and Ideology (London: Allen & Unwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, T. (1980) Capital and Labour (London: Fontana).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, T. (1987) ‘The Politics of Efficiency Review Article’, Work, Employment and Society, vol., no. 2: 260–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, T. and P. Armstrong (1976) Workers Divided (London: Fontana).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyland, C. (1987) ‘Higgins, Scientific Management and the 44 Hour Week’ (paper presented at AIRAANZ Conference, Palmerston North, New Zealand, January 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Onimode, B. (1985) An Introduction to Marxist Political Economy (London: Zed).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozanne, R. (1967) A Century of Labour-Management Relations at McCormick and International Harvester (Madison WI: Wisconsin University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, B. (1975) ‘Class Conception and Conflict: the Thrust for Efficiency, Managerial Views of Labour and the Working Class Rebellion’, Review of Radical Political Economics, 7: 31–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, H. T. (1975) ‘Comment on Yamamura’, in H. F. Williamson (ed.) Evolution of International Management Structures (University of Delaware Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Penn, R. (1982) ‘The Contested Terrain: a Critique of R. C. Edwards’ Theory of Working Class Politics’, in G. Day (ed.), Diversity and Decomposition in the Labour Market (Aldershot: Gower).

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (1972) Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay (Ill.: Scott Foresman).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, R. (1983) The Next American Frontier (New York: Times). Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Technological Change in Australia (1980) Technological Change in Australia (Canberra: AGPS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Riches, L. (1984) ‘The Dimensions of Technological Change and Trade Union Responses’, in Landsbury and Davis (eds), Technology, Work and Industrial Relations (Melbourne: Longman-Cheshire).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, M. and B. Jones (1985) ‘Managerial Strategy and Trade Union Responses to Work Reorganisation Schemes at Establishment Level’, in D. Knights et al. (eds), Job Redesign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N. (1976) Perspectives on Technology (Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Salaman, G. (1981) Class and the Corporation (London: Fontana).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirianni, C. (1980) ‘Workers’ Control in the Era of World War I: a Comparative Analysis of the European Experience’, Theory and Society, 9: 29–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soffer, B. (1960) ‘A Theory of Trade Union Development: the Role of the “Autonomous” Workman’, Labor History, 1: 141–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, A. (1974) Creating Efficient Industrial Administration (New York: Academic Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey, J. (1983) Managerial Prerogative and the Question of Control (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey, J. (1985) ‘The Means of Management Control’, Sociology, vol. 19, no. 2: 193–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. (1983) The Nature of Work (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, J. (1982) The Unequal Struggle (London: Methuen).

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevor, M. (1985) Japanese Industrial Knowledge: Can it Help British Industry? (London: PSI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. (1970) ‘The Organization of Production-Scheduling in Complex Batch-production Situations’, in G. Heald (ed.), Approaches to the Study of Organizational Behaviour (London: Tavistock).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wainwright, H. and D. Elliott (1982) The Lucas Plan: A New Trade Unionism in the Making (London: Allison & Busby).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedderburn, W. (1983) ‘The New Policies in Industrial Relations Law’, in P. Fosh and C. R. Littler (eds), Industrial Relations and the Law in the 1980s (Aldershot: Gower).

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M. and M. Trevor (1983) Under Japanese Management (London: Heinemann).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, B. (1983) The Shopfloor Politics of New Technology (London: Heinemann).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1971) ‘The Vertical Integration of Production: Market Failure Considerations’, American Economic Review, LXI: 112–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. and W. G. Ouchi (1983) ‘The Markets and Hierarchies Programme of Research: Origins, Implications and Prospects’, in A. Francis, J. Turk and P. Willman (eds), Power, Efficiency and Institutions (London: Heinemann).

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, E. (1984) Trade Union Reaction to Technical Change: The Case of the “Chain System” in Victorian Meat Packing (paper presented to the National Conference on Work, Income and Leisure in the Years Ahead, Wollongong).

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner, L. (1977) Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of-control as a Theme in Political Thought (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, S. (ed.) (1982) The Degradation of Work? (London: Hutchinson).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, S. (1987) ‘The Deskilling Debate, New Technology and Work Organization’, Acta Sociologica, vol. 30, no. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, J. (ed.) (1970) Industrial Organization: Behaviour and Control (Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimbalist, A. (ed.) (1979) Case Studies on the Labour Process (New York: Monthly Review Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1990 David Knights and Hugh Willmott

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Littler, C.R. (1990). The Labour Process Debate: A Theoretical Review 1974–88. In: Knights, D., Willmott, H. (eds) Labour Process Theory. Studies in the Labour Process. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20466-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics