Skip to main content
  • 4 Accesses

Abstract

‘The Conservative view of law is, I have suggested, clear, consistent and, through being in harmony with normal feelings, at variance with received ideas. As the will of the state, the law must enact the will of society. The idea of ‘individual freedom’ cannot suffice to generate laws that will be either acceptable to the normal conscience or compatible with normal administrative needs. Nor is it cogent to claim that law derives its legitimacy solely through preserving the individual from ‘harm’. Legitimacy arises from the civil bond alone. Such an attitude to law necessitates a corresponding attitude to punishment. This attitude, which may seem harsh when initially stated, is in reality as humane as its liberal competitors.’ (Roger Scruton, The Meaning of Conservatism, Harmonds worth, Pelican, 1980.)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Select Bibliography

Statutes cited

Bibliography

  • Ashworth A. (1983) Sentencing and Penal Policy, London, Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aughey, A. and Norton, P. (1984) ‘A settled polity: the Conservative view of law and order’ in Norton P. (ed.) Law and Order and British Politics, Farnborough, Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, J. and Koffman, L. (eds) (1985) Police: the Constitution and the Community, London, Professional Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottomley, K. and Pease, K. (1986) Crime and Punishment: Interpreting the Data, Milton Keynes, Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, S. (1976) The Effectiveness of Sentencing: a Review of the Literature, Home Office Research and Planning Unit, London, HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brogden, M. (1982) The Police: Autonomy and Consent, London, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, A.J.P. (1984) Police Management, Farnborough, Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christian, L. (1983) Policing by Coercion, London, GLC Police Support Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke R. and Hough, M. (1984) Crime and Police Effectiveness, Home Office Research and Planning Unit, London, HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conservative Party (1979) The Conservative Manifesto 1979, London, Conservative Central Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conservative Party (1987) The Next Moves Forward, London, Conservative Central Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe (1987) Rubrique Statistique du Bulletin d’Information Penitentiaire No. 8, Centre de Recherches Sociologiques sur le Droit et les Institutions Penales, Janaury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crown Prosecution Service (1986) Code for Crown Prosecutors, London, HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crown Prosecution Service (1987) Annual Report 1986–7, London, HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, L. (1986) ‘Policing the streets’ in Benyon J. and Bourn C. (eds) The Police: Powers, Procedures and Proprieties, Oxford, Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draper, H. (1978) Private Police, Harmondsworth, Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Constabulary (1984) Report for 1983, HC 528, London, HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office (1986) Criminal Justice: A Working Paper, 2nd ed., London, Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office (1987) Statistics on the Operation of Certain Powers under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, Second quarter 1987, Home Office Statistical Bulletin, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office Circulars: 114/1983 Manpower, Effectiveness and Efficiency in the Police Service, 14/1985 The Cautioning of Offenders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, C. and Smith, D. (1988) ‘Evaluating police work’ in Morgan R. and Smith D. (eds) Coming to Terms with Policing, London, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough, M. and Mayhew, P. (1985) Taking Account of Crime: key findings from the second British Crime Survey, Home Office Research Study no. 85, London, HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts (1986), 13th Report, The Financial Management Initiative, London, HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons Home Affairs Committee (1987a) 3rd report, session 1986–7, State and Use of Prisons, London, HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons Home Affairs Committee (1987b) 4th report, session 1986–7, Contract Provision of Prisons, London, HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones Maclean and Young, J. (1986) The Islington Crime Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, R. and Morgan, R. (1980) The Future of the Prison System, Farnborough, Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, R. (1985) Crime and Policing on Merseyside, Merseyside Metropolitan Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labour Party (1986) Protecting Our People, London, Labour Party.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loveday, B. (1985) The Role and Effectiveness of the Merseyside Police Authority, Merseyside County Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lustgarten, L. (1986) The Governance of the Police, London, Sweet and Maxwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • May Committee (1979) Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the United Kingdom Prison Services, London, HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. (1983) ‘How resources are used in the prison system’ in A Prison System for the 1980s and Beyond: the Noel Buxton Lectures 1982–3, London, National Association for the Care and Resettlement of Offenders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. (1987a) ‘The local determinants of policing policy’ in Willmott P. (ed.) Policing and the Community, London, Policy Studies Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. (1987b) ‘Police’ in Parkinson M. (ed.) Reshaping Local Government, Newbury, Policy Journals.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. and King, R. (1987) ‘Profits from prisons’ New Society, 23 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. (1989) ‘“Policing by consent”: legitimating the doctrine’ in Morgan, R. and Smith, D. (eds) Coming to Terms with Policing, London, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Audit Office (1985) Programme for the Provision of Prison Places, London, HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Audit Office (1986) The Financial Management Initiative, London, HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Higgins, M. (1983) ‘Rolling back the welfare state: the rhetoric and reality of public expenditure and social policy under the Conservative government’ in Jones, C. and Stevenson, J. (eds) The Yearbook of Social Policy in Britain, London, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford K. (1986) ‘The power to police effectively’ in Benyon, J. and Bourn, C. (eds) The Police: Powers, Procedures and Proprietories, Oxford, Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prime Minister (1982) Efficiency and Effectiveness in the Civil Service, London, HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Report of the Royal Commission on Criminal Procedure (1981), Cmnd 8092, London, HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, R. (1986) ‘Restructuring the welfare state: an analysis of public expenditure 1979-80-1984-5’, Journal of Public Policy, vol. 15, no. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, A. (1986) Prisons and the Process of Justice, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, I. and Miller, C. (1984) Measures of Police Effectiveness and Efficiency, Research and Planning Unit Paper no. 25, London, HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, S. (1985) Called to Account: The Case for Police Accountability, London, National Council for Civil Liberties.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, V. (1987) Bricks of Shame: Britain’s Prisons, Harmondsworth, Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widdicombe Report (1986) The Conduct of Local Authority Business, Cmnd 9797, London, HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1989 Rod Morgan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Morgan, R. (1989). Criminal Justice. In: McCarthy, M. (eds) The New Politics of Welfare. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20384-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics