Skip to main content

Abstract

‘The Act of 1944, in common with its predecessors of 1870, 1902 and 1918, affords a classic example of what Dicey called “our inveterate prejudice for fragmentary and gradual legislation”. It did not, as some would have wished, sweep the board clean of existing institutions in order to start afresh .... Henceforth every child would have a right to free secondary education and in order that those secondary courses should become a full reality, they were to last for at least four and eventually five years. It was, however, equally important to ensure that a stigma of inferiority did not attach itself to those in secondary institutions .... Even so equality of opportunity would remain something of an empty phrase if children entered the period of compulsory schooling from conditons of family deprivation, or left it to pursue what Churchill called blind-alley occupations.’ (R.A. Butler, The Art of the Possible: Memoirs, Landan, Hamish Hamilton, 1971.)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Select Bibliography

  • Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies (CCCS) (1981) Unpopular Education, London, Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, C.B. and Dyson, A.E. (1969) Fight for Education, A Black Paper, Critical Quarterly Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, C.B. and Dyson, A.E. (1970) The Crisis in Education, Black Paper 2, Critical Quarterly Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, C.B. and Dyson, A.E. (1971) Goodbye Mr Short Black Paper 3, Critical Quarterly Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, C.B. & Boyson, R. (1977) Black Paper 1977, Critical Quarterly Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, C.B and Boyson, R. (1975) Black Paper 1975, The Fight For Education London, Dent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosland, A. (1956) The Future of Socialism, London, Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, M.E. (1980) The State, the Family and Education, London, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, M.E. (1983) ‘The New Right, sex, education and social policy’ in J. Lewis (ed.) Women’s Welfare, Women’s Rights, London, Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, M.E. (1985) ‘Motherhood and social policy: A matter of education?’ Critical Social Policy, 12, Spring.

    Google Scholar 

  • DES (1984) Report by Her Majesty’s Inspectors on the Effects of Local Authority Expenditure Policies on Education Provision in England 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finch, J. (1984) ‘The deceit of self-help: parental playgroups and working class mothers’ Journal of Social Policy, vol. 13, pt 1, pp. 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, I. (1979) The Political Economy of the Welfare State, London, Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halsey, A.H. (ed.) (1972) Educational Priority, vol. 1, London, HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, C. unpublished dissertation in preparation, The Conservative Educationalists, South Bank Polytechnic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, R. (1984) The Welfare State in Crisis, Brighton, Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spender, D. (ed.)(1981) Men’s Studies Modified, Oxford, Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor Report (1977) A New Partnership for our Schools, London, HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worsthorne, P. (1983). The Sunday Times, 27 February.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1989 Miriam David

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

David, M.E. (1989). Education. In: McCarthy, M. (eds) The New Politics of Welfare. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20384-0_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics