Skip to main content

Are You an Animal?

  • Chapter
Animal Experimentation

Abstract

If anthropologists from a strange planet came here to study our intellectual habits and customs, they might notice something rather strange about the way in which we classify the living things on our planet. They would find us using a single word—animal—to describe a very wide range of creatures, including ourselves, from blue whales to tiny micro-organisms that are quite hard to distinguish from plants. On the other hand, they would note also that the commonest use of this word animal is one in which we use it to contrast all these other organisms with our own single species, speaking constantly of ‘animals’ as distinct from humans. It might strike them that in virtually every respect gorillas are much more like ourselves than they are like (say) skin parasites, or even worms and molluscs, so that this use of the word is rather obscure.

‘He who understands baboon would do more towards metaphysics than Locke.’

Charles Darwin’s notebooks

Some parts of this essay have grown out of a paper read at the World Archaeological Congress in September 1986, which will be published in its records under the title ‘Beasts, brutes and monsters’. I am grateful to the organisers of that Congress for permission to reprint these passages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Boakes, R. (1984). From Darwin to Behaviourism, Psychology and the Minds of Animals, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1872). The Expression of Emotions in Man and Animals, John Murray, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, D. R. (1984). Animal Thinking, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, N. K. (1976). In Bateson, P. P. G. and Hinde, R. A. (eds), Growing Points in Ethology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, N. K. (1978). Nature’s psychologists, New Sci., 78, 900–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, M. (1978). Beast and Man, the Roots of Human Nature, Harvester, Brighton

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, M. (1981a). Heart and Mind—the Varieties of Moral Experience, Harvester, Brighton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, M. (1981b). In Sperlinger, D. (ed.), Animals in Research—New Perspectives in Animal Experimentation, John Wiley, Chichester, pp. 319–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, M. (1984). Wickedness, A Philosophical Essay, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rupke, N. A. (1987). Vivisection in Historical Perspective, Croom Helm, London, p. 27

    Google Scholar 

  • Serpell, J. (1986). In the Company of Animals—a Study of Human-Animal Relationships, Basil Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, M. L. (1986). Maternal Deprivation—Experiments in Psychology, a Critique of Animal Models, A report of the American Anti-Vivisection Society

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1989 Mary Midgley

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Midgley, M. (1989). Are You an Animal?. In: Langley, G. (eds) Animal Experimentation. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20376-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics