Skip to main content

Paralysis by Analysis: is your planning system becoming too rational?

  • Chapter

Abstract

During the past three years, we have been involved in a study of strategic planning processes in several financial and commercial organizations. Our findings, when combined with insight gathered from consulting relationships, reveal a disconcerting trend. With increasing frequency we have observed a variety of bureaucratic processes within organizations and technical developments from without that are causing many planning processes to become too rational. By this we mean a condition in which the strategic planning process has become inflexible, formalized and excessively quantitative. In this state, the planning system seems to develop an inertia all of its own that can stifle creative thought and frustrate the most able managers. It appears to be a major contributor to the disenchantment experienced by many line and staff members for whom planning has lost its glow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Charan, R. (1982) ‘How to Strengthen Your Strategy Review Process’, Journal of Business Strategy, 2(3) pp. 50–60.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schoeffler, S., Buzzell, R. and Heany, D. (1974) ‘Impact of Strategic Planning on Profit Performance’, Harvard Business Review, 52 (3) pp. 137–45.

    Google Scholar 

  3. The Boston Consulting Group (1971) ‘Growth and Financial Strategies’, Perspectives (Boston: Boston Consulting Group).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Porter, M. (1980) Competitive Strategy (New York: The Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ansoff, H. (1977) ‘Managing Surprise and Discontinuity: Strategic Response to Weak Signals’, in H. Thorelli (ed.) Strategy + Structure = Performance (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Abernathy, W. and Wayne, K. (1974) ‘Limits of the Learning Curve’, Harvard Business Review, 52 (5) pp. 109–19.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hayes, R. and Garvin, D. (1982) ‘Managing as if Tomorrow Mattered’, Harvard Business Review, 60 (3) pp. 71–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kiechel, W. (1981) ‘The Decline of the Experience Curve’, Fortune, pp. 139–46, 5 October.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kiechel, W. (1981) ‘Three (or four, or more) Ways to Win’, Fortune, pp. 181–8, 19 October.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kiechel, W. (1981) ‘Oh Where, Oh Where Has My Little Dog Gone? Or My Cash Cow? Or My Star?’, Fortune, pp. 140–54, 2 November.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lorange, P. (1980) Corporate Planning: An Executive Viewpoint (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rothschild, W. (1980) ‘How to Ensure the Continued Growth of Strategic Planning’, Journal of Business Strategy, 1 (1) pp. 11–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Steiner, G. (1979) Strategic Planning (New York: The Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lyles, M. and Lenz, R. (1982) ‘Managing the Planning Process: A Field Study of the Human Side of Planning’, Strategic Management Journal, 3 (2) pp. 105–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Donnell, J. (1976) ‘Sixteen Commandments for Outside Directors’, Business Horizons, 19 (1) pp. 45–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cleland, D. and King, W. (1973) ‘Developing a Planning Culture for More Effective Strategic Planning’, Working Paper no. 31, University of Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Emshoff, J. and Mitroff, I. (1978) ‘Improving the Effectiveness of Corporate Planning’, Business Horizons, 21 (5) pp. 49–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1989 Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lenz, R.T., Lyles, M.A. (1989). Paralysis by Analysis: is your planning system becoming too rational?. In: Asch, D., Bowman, C. (eds) Readings in Strategic Management. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20317-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics