Skip to main content

Interests

  • Chapter
The Invisible Hand

Part of the book series: The New Palgrave ((NPA))

Abstract

‘Interest’ or ‘interests’ is one of the most central and controversial concepts in economics and, more generally, in social science and history. Since coming into widespread use in various European countries around the latter part of the 16th century as essentially the same Latin-derived word (intérêt, interesse, etc.), the concept has stood for the fundamental forces, based on the drive for self-preservation and self-aggrandizement, that motivate or should motivate the actions of the prince or the state, of the individual, and later of groups of people occupying a similar social or economic position (classes, interest groups). When related to the individual, the concept has at times had a very inclusive meaning, encompassing interest in honour, glory, self-respect, and even after-life, while at other times it became wholly confined to the drive for economic advantage. The esteem in which interest-motivated behaviour is held has also varied drastically. The term was originally pressed into service as a euphemism serving, already in the late Middle Ages, to make respectable an activity, the taking of interest on loans, that had long been considered contrary to divine law and known as the sin of usury. In its wider meanings, the term at times achieved enormous prestige as a key to a workable and peaceful social order. But it has also been attacked as degrading to the human spirit and corrosive of the foundations of society. An inquiry into these multiple meanings and appreciations is in effect an exploration of much of economic history and in particular of the history of economic and political doctrine in the West over the past four centuries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Ball, T. 1983. The ontological presuppositions and political consequences of a social science. In Changing Social Science, ed. D.R. Sabia, Jr. and J.T. Wallulis, Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, K.E. 1973. The Economy of Love and Fear: A Preface to Grants Economics. Belmont, California: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, E. 1790. Reflections on the Revolution in France. Chicago: Regnery, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlyle, T. 1843. Past and Present. New York: New York University Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collard, D. 1978. Altruism and Economy: A Study in Non-selfish Economics. Oxford: Robertson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collini, S., Winch, D. and Burrow, J. 1983. That Noble Science of Politics: A Study in Nineteenth-century Intellectual History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, A. 1784. Letters from Phocion, Numer I. In The Works of Alexander Hamilton, ed. John C. Hamilton, New York: C.S. Francis, 1851, Vol. II, 322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Himmelfarb, G. 1984. The Idea of Poverty: England in the Early Industrial Age. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A.O. 1977. The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism Before its Triumph. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A.O. 1982a. Rival interpretations of market society: civilizing, destructive, or feeble? Journal of Economic Literature, 20(4), December, 1463–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A.O. 1982b. Shifting Involvements: Private Interest and Public Action. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A.O. 1985. Against parsimony: three easy ways of complicating some categories of economic discourse. Economics and Philosophy, 1, 7–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. 1742. Essays Moral, Political and Literary. Ed. T. H. Green and T. H. Grose, London: Longmans, 1898.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J.M. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan; New York: Harcourt, Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macaulay, T.B. 1829. Mill’s Essay on Government. In Utilitarian Logic and Politics, ed. J. Lively and J. Rees. Oxford: Clarendon, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, M.S. 1984. Limits on self-seeking: the role of morality in economic life. In Neoclassical Political Economy, ed. D.C. Colander, Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger, 71–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, H. 1982. Selfishness, Altruism and Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinecke, F. 1924. Die Idee der Staatsträson in der neueren Geschichte. Munich: Oldenburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. 1820. Essay on Government. In Utilitarian Logic and Politics, ed. J. Lively and J. Rees, Oxford: Clarendon, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, G. 1986. On the convergences of Hirschman’s Exit, Voice and Loyalty and Shifting Involvements. In Development, Democracy and the Art of Trespassing: Essays in Honor of A.O. Hirschman, ed. A. Foxley, et al., Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, E.S. (ed.) 1975. Altruism, Morality and Economic Theory. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pocock, J.G.A. 1982. The political economy of Burke’s analysis of the French Revolution. Historical Journal 25, June, 331–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohan, H., Duc, de. 1638. De l’interêt des princes et états de la chrétienité. Paris: Pierre Margat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T.C. 1984. Choice and Consequence. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. 1911. The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. 1977. Rational fools: a critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory. Philosophy and Public Affairs 6(4), Summer, 317–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Ed. E. Cannan, New York: Modern Library, 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steuart, J. 1767. Inquiry into the Principles of Political Oeconomy. Ed. A.S. Skinner, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winch, D. 1985. The Burke-Smith problem and late eighteenth century political and economic thought. Historical Journal 28(1), 231–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

John Eatwell Murray Milgate Peter Newman

Copyright information

© 1989 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hirschman, A.O. (1989). Interests. In: Eatwell, J., Milgate, M., Newman, P. (eds) The Invisible Hand. The New Palgrave. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20313-0_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20313-0_19

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-49533-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-20313-0

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics