The social sciences, and economics in particular, separated from moral and political philosophy in the second half of the 18th century when the results of the myriad of intentional actions of people were perceived to produce regularities resembling the laws of a system. Both physiocratic thought and Smith’s Wealth of Nations reflect this extraordinary discovery: scientific laws thought to be found only in nature could also be found in society. This extension poses several problems. A serious one refers to the tension of combining individuals’ freedom of action with the scientists’ desire to discover the systematic aspects of the unintended and quite often unpredictable consequences of human action, i.e. the desire to arrive at laws characterized by a certain degree of generality and permanence.
KeywordsNatural Science Austrian Economic Classical Economist Neoclassical Economic Neoclassical Theory
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Arrow, K. 1985. Economic history: a necessary though not sufficient condition for an economist. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 75(2), May, 320–23.Google Scholar
- Keynes, J.M. 1973. The General Theory and After. Part II: Defence and Development. In The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, Vol. XIV, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Menger, C. 1883. Unterschungen über die Methode der Sozialwissenschaften. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
- Mill, J.S. 1836. On the definition of political economy and the method of investigation proper to it. Reprinted in Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Essays on Economy and Society, ed. J.M. Robson, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1967, Vol. 4.Google Scholar
- Mises, L. von. 1949. Human Action. A Treatise on Economics. London: William Hodge.Google Scholar