Abstract
The purpose of this book has been to analyse critically neoclassical macroeconomics as it is taught. The presentation has gone into considerable detail, and the reader might have lost track of the basic purpose of the critique. The basic purpose has been to refute the fundamental macroeconomic ‘parables’ of neoclassical theory: (1) other things equal, more employment requires a lower ‘real wage’ (commodity wage); and (2) other things equal, increases in the price level are proportional to increases in the money supply. Each parable can be restated in the more journalistic and ideological form in which one frequently encounters them: (1) cutting wages will bring full employment; and (2) inflation is the result of increases in the money supply.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
One such curiosity is the excellent attempt at a neo-Keynesian/neo-Ricardian text by Robinson and Eatwell. (Joan Robinson and John Eatwell, An Introduction to Modern Economics (London: McGraw-Hill, 1973).)
An important exception is Colander, in which the aggregate production function is used only to explain pre-Keynesian models and not subsequently. David Colander, Macroeconomics (Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman, 1986).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1989 John Weeks
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Weeks, J. (1989). The Critique of Neoclassical Macroeconomics Summarised. In: A Critique of Neoclassical Macroeconomics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20296-6_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20296-6_16
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-49382-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-20296-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)