Skip to main content

Part of the book series: St. Antony’s ((STANTS))

  • 30 Accesses

Abstract

Much attention has been devoted in this volume to the top Soviet leader from Lenin to Gorbachev, but as T. H. Rigby pointed out in Chapter 2 (p. 5), it is really only in the period of ‘high Stalinism’ that the Soviet Union could meaningfully be regarded as a personal dictatorship, albeit one with a number of specific Communist features. Even then, other institutions, such as ministries, could wield substantial power, however helpless their individual heads might be vis-à- vis Stalin personally.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Richard E. Neustadt, Presidential Power: The Politics of Leadership from FDR to Carter, 2nd edn. (New York: Wiley, 1980) p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Archie Brown, ‘Andropov: Discipline and Reform?’ Problems of Communism, Vol. XXXII, No. 1, January-February 1983, pp. 18–31.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Valerie Bunce, Do New Leaders Make a Difference? Executive Succession and Public Policy under Capitalism and Socialism (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Philip G. Roeder, ‘Do New Soviet Leaders Really Make a Difference? Rethinking the “Succession Connection”’, American Political Science Review, Vol. 79, No. 4, December 1985, pp. 958–76; and Valerie Bunce and Philip G. Roeder, ‘The Effects of Leadership Succession in the Soviet Union’, American Political Science Review, Vol. 80, No. 1, March 1986, pp. 215–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Thane Gustafson and Dawn Mann, ‘Gorbachev’s Next Gamble’, Problems of Communism, Vol. XXXVI, No. 4, July-August 1987, pp. 1–20, at p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Thane Gustafson and Dawn Mann, ‘Gorbachev’s First Year: Building Power and Authority’, Problems of Communism, Vol. XXXV, No. 3, May-June 1986, pp. 1–19, at pp. 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  7. George Brown, In My Way (London: Pelican, 1972) p. 247.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Henry Kissinger, White House Years (Boston: Little, Brown, 1979), p. 796.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Robert A. Dahl, Dilemmas of Pluralist Democracy: Autonomy vs. Control (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1982) pp. 39–40.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jean Blondel, Political Leadership: Towards a General Analysis (London and Beverly Hills: Sage, 1987) p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Robert C. Tucker, Politics as Leadership (Columbia and London: University of Missouri Press, 1981) p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Archie Brown

Copyright information

© 1989 Archie Brown

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brown, A. (1989). Conclusions. In: Brown, A. (eds) Political Leadership in the Soviet Union. St. Antony’s. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20262-1_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics