Skip to main content

The courtly Tempest

  • Chapter
Book cover The Tempest

Part of the book series: The Critics Debate ((TCD))

  • 13 Accesses

Abstract

THE SPECIALNESS OF The Tempest — something like a court masque, but altogether firmer, less evanescent — would have been seen by James I and its first audiences to have been in that very open-ness we are just learning to celebrate again: its meanings both firmly rooted, as in its celebration of royal power in the new plantation in James Town, Virginia; and at the same time free to change shapes at the behest of the royal master: to have, by good magic, freedom in space and time. The Tempest is indeed a play which, though firmly established in the very front of the 1623 Folio, has continued a free life, successively turning into new shapes of great interest, from Milton’s Cornus to Auden’s The Sea and the Mirror from Fletcher to the late-twentieth-century Caribbean remakings. Other plays have been adapted: only The Tempest lives on in quite this remarkable way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Copyright information

© 1989 David Daniell

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Daniell, D. (1989). The courtly Tempest. In: The Tempest. The Critics Debate. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20229-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics