Skip to main content

Virgilian Limbo: ‘The Hollow Men’, Ash-Wednesday and ‘Coriolan’

  • Chapter
  • 27 Accesses

Abstract

Eliot’s affinity for the dark side of Virgil’s ‘divided genius’ shows at its most intense in The Waste Land, but it never left him. Certainly there is a change of emphasis between Eliot’s earlier and later appreciations of Virgil. As Chapter 2 argued, however, Eliot remained alert to the dark side even when leaning toward a neoclassical version of Virgil. This chapter will trace the path by which Eliot arrived at his later, comprehensive view of Virgil, which reconciles the opposing tendencies of the Aeneid itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. E. J. Stormon, S. J., ‘Virgil and the Modern Poet’, Meanjin, 6 (Aut. 1947), 15n.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. Adelaide Hahn, ‘Aeneid 6.739-751’, The Classical Weekly, 20 (May 23, 1927), 215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wendell Clausen, ‘An Interpretation of the Aeneid’, in Virgil: A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. Steele Commager, pp. 87–8. For the theory that the gates of horn and ivory have to do with ‘an ancient superstition... that dreams before midnight were false; after midnight true’, Clausen refers to the edition by Eduard Norden of Aeneid VI (Stuttgart, 1927). The theory was propounded by W. Everett, Classical Review, 14 (1900), 153ff

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. See Donald Gallup, T. S. Eliot: A Bibliography, 2nd ed. (London: Faber and Faber, 1969), p. 211.

    Google Scholar 

  5. William M. Chace, The Political Identities of Ezra Pound & T. S. Eliot (Stanford: Stanford U.P., 1973), pp. 159

    Google Scholar 

  6. Maurras, pp. 39–40. F. O. Matthiessen, The Achievement of T. S. Eliot (Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1935), pp. 82–3

    Google Scholar 

  7. Aspects de la France, 25 April 1948; and James Torrens, S. J., ‘Charles Maurras and Eliot’s “New Life”’, 89 (March 1974), 316.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Donald Davie, ‘Anglican Eliot’, read at the thirty-first session of the English Institute, Harvard University, Sept. 2–5, 1972, published in Eliot in His Time: Essays on the Occasion of the Fiftieth Anniversary of ‘The Waste Land’, ed. A. Walton Litz (Princeton and London: Princeton U.P. and Oxford U.P., 1973), p. 183.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1989 Gareth Reeves

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reeves, G. (1989). Virgilian Limbo: ‘The Hollow Men’, Ash-Wednesday and ‘Coriolan’. In: T. S. Eliot: A Virgilian Poet. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20221-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics