Skip to main content
Book cover

Finance pp 252–264Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

Takeovers and The Stock Market

  • Chapter
  • 888 Accesses

Part of the book series: The New Palgrave ((NPA))

Abstract

In a market economy the stock exchange has a triple role, first to pool together society’s savings dispersed among individual savers; second to channel selectively these savings to companies with the best investment prospects, and third to encourage the efficient use of assets embodying past savings. Two interrelated mechanisms are involved. A primary market mechanism, whereby new issues of shares are made by companies wishing to raise funds, and a secondary market mechanism whereby trade in the existing shares of companies is carried out. A company whose equities are traded at a relatively low price will find it relatively expensive or impossible to raise new funds in the primary market. It may also be subject to the threat of a takeover in which a majority ownership stake in its equity is acquired by another company whose objective is to change policies to improve the stock price. Management teams may thus compete in a market for corporate control, and takeovers may then be interpreted as a central part of the stock market selection process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Alchian, A.A. 1950. Uncertainty, evolution, and economic theory. Journal of Political Economy 58, June, 211–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alchian, A.A. and Kessel, R.A. 1962. Competition monopoly and the pursuit of pecuniary gain. In Aspects of Labour Economics, N.B.E.R. Princeton, pp 157–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alchian, A.A. and Demsetz, H. 1972. Production, information costs and economic organization. American Economic Review 62, 777–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, F. 1986. Noise. Journal of Finance, July, 549–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boesky, I.F. 1985. Merger Mania. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conn, R.L. 1985. A re-examination of merger studies that use the capital asset pricing methodology. Cambridge Journal of Economics, March, 43–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowling, K. et al. 1980. Mergers and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cragg, J. and Malkiel, B. 1982. Expectations and the Structure of Share Prices. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J.R. and Kuehn, D.A. 1977. An investigation into the effectiveness of a capital market sanction on poor performance. In Welfare Aspects of Industrial Markets, A.P. Jacquemin and H.W. de Jong, ed. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P.L. 1976. The Regulation of Take-Overs and Merger. London: Sweet & Maxwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodd, P. 1986. The market for corporate control: a review of the evidence. In The Revolution in Corporate Finance, ed. J.M. Stern and D.H. Chew, Jr. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firth, M. 1979. The profitability of takeovers and mergers. Economic Journal 89, June, 316–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firth, M. 1980. Takeovers, shareholder returns and the theory of the firm. Quarterly Journal of Economics 94, March, 235–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortune 1986a. The Fortune 500, 28 April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortune 1986b. Deals of the year, 20 January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortune 1986c. Merger fees that bend the mind, 20 January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, A. 1980. Company objectives, managerial motivations and the behaviour of large firms: an empirical test of the theory of managerial capitalism. Cambridge Journal of Economics, December, 349–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. 1953. Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gort, M. 1969. An economic disturbance theory of mergers. Quarterly Journal of Economics 83, November, 624–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greer, D.F. 1986. Acquiring in order to avoid acquisition. The Anti-Trust Bulletin, Spring.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, S.J. and Hart, O.D. 1980. Takeover bids, the free rider problem and the theory of the corporation. The Bell Journal of Economics 11(1), Spring, 42–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, S.J. and Hart, O.D. 1981. The allocation role of takeover bids in conditions of assymetric information. Journal of Finance 36, 297–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, P. 1983. Corporate acquisitions: a theory of special cases? A review of event studies applied to acquisitions. Journal of Finance, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannah, L. 1976. The Rise of the Corporate Economy. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannah, L. and Kay, J.A. 1977. Concentration in Modern Industry. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R.S., Stewart, J.F., Guilkey, D.K. and Carleton, W.T. 1982. Characteristics of acquired firms: fixed and random coefficients probit analysis. Southern Economic Journal, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, P.E. and Prais, S.J. 1956. The analysis of business concentration. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 119 (Part 2), 150–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herman, E. S. 1981. Corporate Control Corporate Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, A., Mueller, D.C. and Singh, A. 1980. Hypotheses about mergers. In Mueller (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, A. and Singh, A. 1980. Merger concentration and competition in advanced capitalist economies: an international perspective. In Mueller (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, A. and Kumar, M.S. 1985. Merger concentration and mobility amongst the largest UK non-financial corporations 1972–82. A Report to the Office of Fair Trading, Department of Applied Economics, Cambridge (mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, A. 1987. The impact of merger: a survey of empirical evidence for the UK. In Mergers and Merger Policy, ed. J.A. Kay and J. Fairburn, London (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jay, J. 1986. Argyll recounts the cost. Sunday Times, 21 December, p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, W.H. 1976. Theory of the firm: managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M.C. and Ruback, R.S. 1983. The market for corporate control; the scientific evidence. Journal of Financial Economics 11(1–4), 5–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, H.G. 1968. The economic approach to social questions. London School of Economic and Political Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, Sir A.J. 1980. The City Take-Over Code. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, S.M. 1983. Stock Market Efficiency. Oxford: Philip Allan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuehn, D.A. 1975. Takeovers and the Theory of the Firm. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, M.S. 1984. Growth Acquisition and Investment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein, H. 1966. Allocative efficiency v. X-efficiency. American Economic Review 56, 392–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, I.M.D. and Rayner, A.G. 1966. Higgledy Piggledy Growth Again. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markham, J.W. 1955. Survey of the evidence and findings on mergers, in Business Concentration and Price Policy. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marris, R.L. 1964. The Economic Theory of Managerial Capitalism. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marris, R.L. and Mueller, D.C. 1980. The corporation, competition and the invisible hand. Journal of Economic Literature, March, 32–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. 1971. Capital. A Critique of Political Economy, Vol. III. London: Lawrence & Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayshar, J. 1983. On divergence of opinion and imperfections in the capital market. American Economic Review 73, March, 114–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meade, J.S. 1968. Is the ‘New Industrial Estate’ inevitable? Economic Journal, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeks, G. 1977. Disappointing Marriage: a Study of the Gains from Merger. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, E. 1977. Risk, uncertainty and divergence of opinion. Journal of Finance, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, D.C. 1969. A theory of conglomerate mergers. Quarterly Journal of Economics 83, November, 643–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, D.C. ed. 1980. The Determinants and Effects of Mergers. Cambridge, Mass.: O.G. and H.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, D.C. 1986. Profits in the Long Run. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nerlove, M. 1968. Factors affecting difference among rates of return on investment in individual common stocks. Review of Economics and Statistics 50, August, 312–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newbould, G.D. 1970. Management and Merger Activity. Liverpool: Guthstead.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravenscraft, D.J. and Scherer, F.M. 1986. Life after Takeover. US Federal Trade Commission Bureau of Economics, Working Paper 139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, S.D. 1985. Power Empire Building and Mergers. Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleifer, P. 1986. Do demand curves for stocks slope down? Journal of Finance, July, 579–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiller, R.J. 1979. Do stock prices move too much to be justified by subsequent changes in dividends? American Economic Review 71(3), June, 421–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A. 1971. Takeovers: Their Relevance to the Stockmarket and the Theory of the Firm, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A. 1975. Takeovers economic natural selection and the theory of the firm: evidence from the post war UK experience. Economic Journal 85(339), September, 497–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, P.O. 1975. Mergers: Motives, Effects, Control. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, L.H. 1986. Does the stock market rationally reflect fundamental values? Journal of Finance, July, 591–601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, S.G. Jr. 1964. Economic ‘natural selection’ and the theory of the firm. Yale Economic Essays 4(1), Spring, 225–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, S.G. Jr. 1971. Satisficing, selection and the innovating remnant. Quarterly Journal of Economics 85, May, 237–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yarrow, G.K. 1985. Shareholder protection, compulsory acquisition and the efficiency of the takeover process. Journal of Industrial Economics 34, September, 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

John Eatwell Murray Milgate Peter Newman

Copyright information

© 1989 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hughes, A., Singh, A. (1989). Takeovers and The Stock Market. In: Eatwell, J., Milgate, M., Newman, P. (eds) Finance. The New Palgrave. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20213-3_29

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics