Structure, Politics and Ideology

  • Andrew J. Taylor


Chapter 2 examines, first, the organisation and structure of the union movements in the five countries considered, and explores the relationship between structure and political influence. Second, what is the nature of union government and, in particular, the extent of oligarchy? Third, what is the role of the national centres in their respective political systems. Finally, is there a union ideology which underpins political behaviour? This chapter’s hypothesis is that a centralised union movement composed of few industrial unions with a collectivist ethos enjoying a high density of membership will be more influential than a decentralised movement with many unions and a low density of membership.1 This hypothesis can be expressed diagramatically (see Figure 2.1 and Table 2.1).


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. 1.
    J. Hay ward, ‘Trade Union Movements and their Politico-Economic Framework’, in J. Hayward (ed.), Trade Unions and Politics in Western Europe (London: Cass, 1980) pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
  2. M. Poole, Industrial Relations. Origins and Patterns of National Diversity (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1986) provides a useful introduction.Google Scholar
  3. 2.
    R. Michels, Political Parties, orig. pub. 1915 (New York: Collier-Macmillan, 1962) sets out the inevitability of oligarchy. Useful studies are,Google Scholar
  4. J.D. Goldstein, The Government of British Trade Unions (London: Allen & Unwin, 1952),Google Scholar
  5. S.M. Lipset, M. Trow and J. Coleman, Union Democracy (New York: Free Press, 1956),Google Scholar
  6. J. Hemingway, Conflict and Democracy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978),Google Scholar
  7. W. Galenson, Trade Union Democracy in Western Europe (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1962), andGoogle Scholar
  8. A. Carew, Democracy and Government in European Trade Unions (London: Allen & Unwin, 1976).Google Scholar
  9. 3.
    A. Flanders, Management and Unions, (London: Faber, 1970) pp. 30–1.Google Scholar
  10. 4.
    A.H. Cook, An Introduction to Japanese Trade Unionism (New York: Cornell University Press, 1966) p. 98.Google Scholar
  11. 5.
    D. McLaughlin and A.L. Shoomaker, The Landrum-Griffin Act and Union Democracy (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1979).Google Scholar
  12. J. Gaventa, Power and Powerlessness (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980) examines the situation in one union (the Mine-workers).Google Scholar
  13. 6.
    DGB 1981 Programme, quoted in D. Schuster, DGB. The German Trade Union Movement (Bonn: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, 1985).Google Scholar
  14. See also, R.J. Willey, Democracy in the West German Trade Unions (London: Sage, 1971).Google Scholar
  15. 7.
    S. Hadenius, Swedish Politics in the Twentieth Century (Stockholm: The Swedish Institute, 1981) pp. 131–2.Google Scholar
  16. 8.
    W. Korpi, The Working Class in Welfare Capitalism (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1978) pp. 234–6, andGoogle Scholar
  17. L. Lewin, Governing Swedish Trade Unions (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
  18. 9.
    G.K. Wilson, Unions in American National Politics (London: Macmillan, 1979) pp. 118–25, andCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. M. Warner and J.D. Edelstein, Comparative Union Democracy (New York: Transaction Books, 1978).Google Scholar
  20. 10.
    AFL-CIO, The Changing Situation of Workers and Their Unions (Washington: AFL-CIO, 1985) p. 13, andGoogle Scholar
  21. A.R. Schwartz and M.M. Hoyman, ‘The Changing of the Guard: The New American Labor Leader’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 473 (May 1984) pp. 64–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 11.
    Democracy in Trade Unions, Cmnd. 8778 (February 1983) para. 2, p. 1, andGoogle Scholar
  23. A.J. Taylor, The Trade Unions and the Labour Party (London: Croom Helm, 1987) pp. 159–68.Google Scholar
  24. 12.
    T. Shirai, ‘Decision-Making in Japanese Unions’, in E.F. Vogel (ed.), Modern Japanese Organisations and Decision Making (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1975) p. 171,Google Scholar
  25. my emphasis, and J. Watanuki et al., Electorial Behaviour in the 1983 Japanese Elections (Tokyo: University of Sophia Institute of International Relations, 1986) p. 187.Google Scholar
  26. 13.
    Shirai, ‘Decision-Making’, p. 184.Google Scholar
  27. 14.
    R. Martin, The TUC. The Growth of a Pressure Group 1868–1978 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980), andGoogle Scholar
  28. D. Barnes and E. Reid, Government and Trade Unions (London: Heinemann/Policy Studies Institute, 1980).Google Scholar
  29. 15.
    Taylor, The Trade Unions and the Labour Party, pp. 199–205.Google Scholar
  30. 16.
    Schuster, DGB, p. 158.Google Scholar
  31. 17.
    Wilson, Unions in American National Politics, p. 187.Google Scholar
  32. 18.
    AFL-CIO News, 34(44) (1 November 1986).Google Scholar
  33. 19.
    AFL-CIO, The Changing Situation, pp. 22–6.Google Scholar
  34. 20.
    C.M. Rehmus, ‘Labor and Politics in the 1980’s, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 473 (May 1984) pp. 40–51, andCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. ‘Declining force — increasing power’, The Economist (14 February 1987) pp. 35–37.Google Scholar
  36. 21.
    The Swedish Trade Union Confederation (Stockholm: LO, 1985) p. 15.Google Scholar
  37. 22.
    L.G. Albage, ‘Recent Trends in Collective Bargaining in Sweden’, International Labour Review, 125(1) (Jan–Feb, 1986) p. 116.Google Scholar
  38. 23.
    TCO 1986–1989 Draft Programme (Stockholm: TCO, 1985) para. 1.5, p. 1, and, The Unions and the Party — A Team (Stockholm: LO, 1984) p. 1.Google Scholar
  39. 24.
    ‘Sohyo’s Programme’, quoted in Sohyo News, 360 (15 July 1980) p. 2.Google Scholar
  40. 25.
    A.B. Cole et al. Socialist Parties in Post-War Japan (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1966) p. 317, andGoogle Scholar
  41. J.R. Soukup, ‘Labor and Politics in Japan: A Study of Interest Group Attitudes and Activities’, Journal of Politics, 22 (1960) p. 314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 26.
    Sohyo News, 360 (15 July 1980) pp. 3, 9.Google Scholar
  43. 27.
    A. Flanders, ‘The Tradition of Voluntarism’, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 12 (1974) pp. 352–70,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. M. Rogin, ‘Voluntarism: The Political Functions of an Anti-Political Doctrine’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 15(4) (1962) pp. 521–3, and,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. S. and B. Webb, Industrial Democracy (London: Longmans, 1902) Chapters 2 and 4.Google Scholar
  46. 28.
    Royal Commission on Trade Unions and Employers’ Associations 1965–1968 Report (Donovan Commission), Cmnd. 3623 (June 1968) para. 40, p. 10.Google Scholar
  47. 29.
    Trade Unionism (London: TUC, 1966) para. 149, p. 36 and para. 174, pp. 68–9, my emphasis.Google Scholar
  48. 30.
    TUC Strategy (London: TUC, 1984) para. 32, p. 11, and Taylor, The Trade Unions and the Labour Party, pp. 84–9.Google Scholar
  49. 31.
    C. Patten, The Tory Case (London: Longmans, 1983) p. 129.Google Scholar
  50. 32.
    Hands Up For Democracy (London: TUC, 1983), pp. 3, 10.Google Scholar
  51. 33.
    AFL-CIO, The Changing Situation, pp. 5–6.Google Scholar
  52. 34.
    A Guide to Basic Law and Procedures (Washington: National Labor Relations Board, 1979) p. 55.Google Scholar
  53. 35.
    H. Holloway, ‘Interest Groups in the Post-Partisan Era’, Political Science Quarterly, 94 (1979) pp. 117–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 36.
    Department of Labor. 70th Annual Report (Washington, 1982) pp. 57, 67.Google Scholar
  55. 37.
    R.L. Trumka (President of the Mineworkers), quoted in the National Journal, 16 (19) (12 May 1984) p. 927.Google Scholar
  56. 38.
    TCO Draft Programme 1986–89, para. 1.4, p. 5.Google Scholar
  57. 39.
    Swedish Trade Union Confederation, pp.3, 6.Google Scholar
  58. 40.
    The Basic Agreement, ‘General Grounds for the Basic Agreement’ (1938), my emphasis. See also, L. Forseback, Industrial Relations and Employment in Sweden (Stockholm: The Swedish Institute, 1981) pp. 10–12.Google Scholar
  59. 41.
    Schuster, DGB, p. 106.Google Scholar
  60. 42.
    P. Schwerdtner, ‘Trade Unions in the German Economic and Social Order’, Zeitschrift für die Gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 135 (1979) pp. 454–73, andGoogle Scholar
  61. K. Burchardt, Employment and Social Security in the Federal Republic of Germany (Bonn: Asgard Verlag, 1980) p. 7.Google Scholar
  62. 43.
    The Collective Bargaining System in the Federal Republic of Germany (Cologne: Bundesvereinigung der Deutschen Arbeitgeberverbande, 1984) pp. 2, 5, my emphasis.Google Scholar
  63. 44.
    Cook, An Introduction to Japanese Trade Unionism, p. 111, and This Is Sohyo (Tokyo: Sohyo, 1985) p. 33.Google Scholar
  64. 45.
    This Is Sohyo (Tokyo: Sohyo, 1985) pp. 17, 18.Google Scholar
  65. 46.
    Sohyo News, 360 (15 July 1980) pp. 2–3.Google Scholar
  66. 47.
    Sohyo News, 367 (15 August 1981) p. 12.Google Scholar
  67. 48.
    This Is Sohyo (Tokyo: Sohyo, 1985) p. 45, my emphasis.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Andrew Taylor 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew J. Taylor

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations