Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Keynesian Studies ((KST))

  • 28 Accesses

Abstract

Frankel’s charge against Keynes, that he sought to use public deceit in monetary policy, by the deliberate use of money illusion in the labour market, carries with it very serious implications. Not only, it is claimed, will the discovery of the bluff lead to inflationary expectations being ‘built in’ to wage claims and other contracts expressed in money terms, but it will also progressively undermine the moral authority of the monetary order itself.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. S. H. Frankel, Money: Two Philosophies (Oxford: Blackwell, 1977) p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See, for example, J. Tobin, ‘Inflation and Unemployment’, American Economic Review (March 1972) pp. 1–8;

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Trevithick, ‘Money Wage Inflexibility and the Keynesian Labour Supply Function’, Economic Journal (June 1976) pp. 327–32.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. T. Addison and J. Burton, ‘Keynes’s Analysis of Wages and Unemployment Revisited’, The Manchester School (March, 1982) p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Leijonhufvud, On Keynesian Economics and the Economics of Keynes (New York: OUP, 1968) p. 97.

    Google Scholar 

  6. It is interesting to note that Leijonhufvud’s criticism by way of comparison with the consumption function is reversed in the later criticism by H. Grossman of Leijonhufvud’s own acceptance of R. W. Clower’s reinterpretation of the consumption function. See H. Grossman, ‘Was Keynes a “Keynesian”, A Review Article’, Journal of Economic Literature (1972) pp. 26–30.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. M. Keynes, ‘Relative Movements of Real Wages and Output’, Economic Journal (March 1939) pp. 34–51.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1989 Gordon A. Fletcher

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fletcher, G.A. (1989). Employment Policy. In: The Keynesian Revolution and its Critics. Keynesian Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20108-2_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics