Skip to main content

Abstract

Nationalism is one of the key political ideologies of the twentieth century. As such it arouses great controversy and passionate debate. Writers differ concerning the definition, meaning, origins and consequences of nationalism. There is agreement, however, that nationalism is mainly a nineteenth- and twentieth-century phenomenon. It is thus a modern ideology. In the previous chapter James Mayall described nationalism as one of the four components of the modernising mythology and the readings in this chapter explore the meanings and consequences of nationalism in the contemporary international system. Although the modern state is conventionally held to be a nation-state (despite the many anomalies) and national self-determination is an agreed doctrine on which to found a state (although such claims are sometimes ignored) nationalism as a political force gives rise to conflicting responses. This arises mainly because it is both an integrative and disintegrative force and its effects on peoples and societies are uneven and differentiated. Nationalism is an integrative force for the insiders and disintegrative for outsiders. For some nationalism is a positive force in world politics and it provides the basis for equality among different groups. The triumph of nationalism in the current century can be seen of course in the proliferation of the state and the extension of the idea that the primary focus for loyalty is the nation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

2. Nationalism Two Types of Nationalism John Plamenatz

  1. G. Mazzini, Essays, trans. Okey (London, 1894); Selected Writings, ed. N. Gangulee (London, 1946); The Duties of Man and Other Essays (London, 1955).

    Google Scholar 

  2. See O. Jaszi, The Dissolution of the Hapsburg Monarchy (Chicago, 1929).

    Google Scholar 

Toward a Marxist Theory of Nationalism Horace B. Davis References

  • A. Cobban, The Nation State and National Self-Determination (London: Collins, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • R.S. Cohen et al. (eds), For Dirk Struik: Scientific Historical and Political Essays in Honor of Dirk J. Struik (Dordrecht and Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Co., 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Debray, Letter in Sunday Times (Oct. 12, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • K.W. Deutsch, ‘The Growth of Nation States: Some Recurrent Patterns of Political and Social Integration.’ World Politics 5: 168–95, 1953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Geertz, Islam Observed: Religious Development in Morocco and Indonesia (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Gellner, Thought and Change (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Kautsky, Die materialistische Gesichtsaffasung, Vol. 2 (Berlin, 1929).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Luxemburg, ‘The Russian Revolution’, in C. Grunberg (ed.) Archiv Fuer die Geschichte des Sozialismus und der Arbeiterbewegung (Leipiz, 1928).

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Nairn, ‘Scotland and Europe’, New Left Review (Jan. 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • D.B. Schirmer, Republic or Empire: American Resistance to the Philippine War (Cambridge: Mass, Schenkman, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Stalin, Marxism and the National Question: Selected Writings and Speeches (New York, 1942).

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Stoianovich, Review in Political Science Quarterly, vol. 89 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • T.G. Vincent, Black Power and the Garvey Movement (Berkely: Ca, Ramparts Press, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Wiatr, Narod i panstow (Warsaw, Ksiazka i Wiedza, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • E.R. Wolf, Peasant Wars of the Twentieth Century (New York, Harper and Row 1969).

    Google Scholar 

Internationalism A.D. Smith

  1. On élite linguae francae, medieval and modern, cf. E. Haughan, ‘Dialect, Language, Nation’, American Anthropologist 68, 1966, 922–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. H. Seton-Watson, ‘Unsatisfied Nationalisms’, Journal of Contemporary History 6/1, 1971, 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. E. Gellner, Thought and Change, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London 1964, ch. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. Gellner, ‘Scale and Nation’, Philosophy of Social Sciences 3, 1973, 1–17, especially p. 14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. B. Akzin, State and Nation, Hutchison, London 1964, ch. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cf. the analysis of anti-semitism by S. Andreski, Elements of Comparative Sociology, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London 1964, ch. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Seton-Watson, op. cit., and Nationalism, Old and New, Sydney University Press, Sydney 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cf. D. Apter, Some Conceptual Approaches to the Study of Modernisation, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  9. T. Warburton, ‘Nationalism and Language in Switzerland and Canada’, in A.D. Smith (ed.), Nationalist Movements, Macmillan, London 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cf. M. Weber, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, George Allen & Unwin, London 1930, pp. 181–2.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cf. R.G. Hovannisian, Armenia, the Road to Independence, University of California Press, Berkeley 1963;

    Google Scholar 

  12. and C. J. Edmonds, ‘Kurdish Nationalism’, Journal of Contemporary History 6/1, 1971, 87–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. On terrorism generally, cf. P. Wilkinson, Political Terrorism, Macmillan, London 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J.P. Nettl and R. Robertson, International Systems and the Modernisation of Societies, Faber, London 1968. The phrase, ‘a system of locks’ is Gellner’s in Thought and Change, op. cit., p. 175.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R.L. Merritt and S. Rokkan (eds), Comparing Nations, Yale University Press, New Haven 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  16. An interpretation also favoured by some Marxians such as A.G. Frank, Latin America: Underdevelopment or Revolution? Monthly Review Press, New York 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. Martins, ‘Time and Theory In Sociology’, in J. Rex (ed.), Approaches to Sociology. An Introduction to Major Trends in British Sociology, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cf. P. Mercier, ‘On the Meaning of “Tribalism” in Black Africa’, in P.L. van den Berghe (ed.), Africa: Social Problems of Change and Conflict, Chandler, San Francisco 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cf. J. Galtung, The European Community: a Superpower in the Making, George Allen & Unwin, London 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  20. D. de Rougement, The Meaning of Europe, Sidgwick & Jackson, London 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  21. For the notion of ‘concentric circles’, cf. J.S. Coleman, Nigeria: Background to Nationalism, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles 1958.

    Google Scholar 

2 Nationalism

  • B. Anderson, Imagined Communities (London: Verso, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Gellner, Nations and Nationalism (Oxford: Blackwell, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • F.H. Hinsley, Nationalism and the International System (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Munck, The Difficult Dialogue: Marxism and Nationalism (London: Zed, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • T.V. Sathyamurthy, Nationalism in the Contemporary World (London: Frances Pinter, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Marc Williams

Copyright information

© 1989 Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Williams, M. (1989). Nationalism. In: Williams, M. (eds) International Relations in the Twentieth Century. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20081-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics