Abstract
The historical problem for the critic of Anne Brontë — as should by now be clear — is to acknowledge the extent of her indebtedness to her sisters and to her milieu while also recognising the scope of her contributions. That is, Anne’s art is shaped by its context without being confined by it; it is also distinctive, innovative, and influential, especially so on Charlotte. Anne not only took her subjects and techniques from her world, but, like all creative artists, she transformed them.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Cited by Miriam Allott, ‘Introduction’, Critical Heritage, op. cit., p. 60.
Ibid., pp. 29–30.
‘Biographical Notice’, op. cit., p. 6.
Ibid., p. 6.
Ibid., p. 8.
George Moore, op. cit., p. 253.
Miriam Allott, ‘Introduction’, op. cit., p. 46.
Will T. Hale, Anne Brontë: Her Life and Writings (Bloomington, Indiana University, 1929), p. 43.
Ibid., p. 44.
George Moore, op. cit., pp. 256–8.
Miriam Allott, ‘Introduction’, op cit., p. 49.
Copyright information
© 1989 Elizabeth Langland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Langland, E. (1989). Critics on Anne Brontë: a ‘literary Cinderella’. In: Anne Brontë. Women Writers. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20058-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20058-0_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-42301-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-20058-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)