Abstract
It was no mean achievement for the United States and the Soviet Union to agree upon the limitation of Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) systems and the limitation of nuclear missiles in May 1972. However, the West Europeans were always nervous that the US-Soviet détente might evolve into a US-Soviet entente and at the expense of their own security. Indeed these fears were taken sufficiently seriously in Washington for the US Government to take measures to reassert the unalterability of the US commitment to the common defence. The means by which this was done necessarily exacerbated differences with the Russians over the negotiating agenda at SALT II. For the United States sought to reassure its West European allies by focusing on the utility of US forward-based systems which so much concerned the Soviet military. The renewed focus on this US capability naturally reinforced the concern of the Soviet military to reduce this asset through negotiation or, if this proved impossible, to negate the value of this capability through the deployment of countervailing forces by the Soviet Union.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1989 Jonathan Haslam
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Haslam, J. (1989). SALT’S Side–Effects, 1973–74. In: The Soviet Union and the Politics of Nuclear Weapons in Europe, 1969–87. Studies in Soviet History and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20010-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20010-8_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-38896-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-20010-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)