Skip to main content

Part of the book series: The Critics Debate ((TCD))

  • 34 Accesses

Abstract

Over the last hundred years a large number of distinguished scholars have directed their energies to the editing of Blake’s literary work. The task they have undertaken has been an impossible one, since no printed text can adequately represent either a Blakean engraved book or a much-altered manuscript like that of The Four Zoas. Yet the impossible undertaking has also been necessary and valuable, because Blake’s writings present innumerable problems of the sort that are commonly addressed rather by editors than by critics. The first attempt to produce a complete edition of Blake’s work, that of EJ. Ellis and W.B. Yeats, was grossly inaccurate and is now more significant for students of Yeats than for students of Blake. The edition which established a generally reliable text was that of Sir Geoffrey Keynes, which appeared in three volumes in 1925. Keynes’s work has in some respects been superseded by that of later scholars, but in its time it was a historic achievement comparable with Grierson’s edition of Donne. In the context of this undertaking Songs of Innocence and Experience was a relatively unproblematic text; but a comparison of Keynes’s later one-volume editions of Blake’s writings reveals some of the special problems which an editor of that text has to face.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Copyright information

© 1989 David W. Lindsay

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lindsay, D.W. (1989). Defining the text. In: Blake: Songs of Innocence and Experience. The Critics Debate. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20005-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics