Abstract
Should Britain retain nuclear weapons? This question has become particularly significant at the time when the Superpowers are reducing various categories of nuclear weapons. Advances in weapons technology mean that it is becoming increasingly expensive for Britain to retain credible membership of the nuclear club. Some argue that defence budgets should be spent on low-cost missiles or on conventional forces. The chapter concludes with an examination of the nuclear disarmers and their organisation.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Further Reading
Bartlett, C. J. (1972) The Long Retreat: A Short History of British Defence Policy, 1945–70, London, Macmillan.
Dillon, G. M. (1983) Dependence and Deterrence, Aldershot, Gower.
Freedman, L. (ed.) (1983) The Troubled Alliance: Atlantic Relations in the 1980s, London, Heinemann.
Minnion, J. and Bolsover, P. (eds) (1983) The CND Story, London, Allison & Busby.
Shepherd, A. (1987) ‘The Politics of Nuclear Protest in the Fifties: CND and the Early New Left’, in L. Robins (ed.) Topics in British Politics, London, Political Education Press.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 1992 Bill Coxall and Lynton Robins
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Coxall, B. (1992). Doctrines of Nuclear Defence and the Disarmers’ Protest. In: Robins, L. (eds) Contemporary British Politics. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19867-2_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19867-2_25
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-34046-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-19867-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)