Abstract
British defence policy is clearly at an important crossroads. The argument presented in the last chapter suggests that the government cannot go on for much longer, as it has been doing in recent years, ‘muddling through’ on a day-to-day basis without serious damage to the nation’s defence effort. A significant increase in defence expenditure would help to ease the immediate problems created by a ‘funding gap’, but as we have argued earlier, this appears unlikely to happen. If the government is not to weaken defence across the board by incremental ‘salami slicing’, a more radical assessment of priorities is clearly necessary. But what form should this take?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
See K. Booth and J. Baylis, Britain, Nato and Nuclear Weapons: Alternative Defence Versus Alliance Reform ( London: Macmillan, 1988 ).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1989 John Baylis
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baylis, J. (1989). Striking the Right Balance for the Future. In: British Defence Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19823-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19823-8_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-49133-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-19823-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)