Abstract
The very use of the term ‘equality’ is often clouded by imprecise and inconsistent meanings. For example, ‘equality’ is used to mean equality before the law (equality of treatment by authorities), equality of opportunity (equality of chances in the economic system), and equality of result (equal distribution of goods), among other things. These different meanings often conflict, and are almost never wholly consistent. See Hayek (1960, p. 85; 1976, pp. 62–4) for a discussion of equality beforè the law and equality of result, and Rawls (1971) for a discussion of equality of opportunity within a theory of distributive justice. Elsewhere I have discussed the difference between equality of opportunity and equality of result in education (Coleman, 1975). See also Pole (1978) for a detailed examination of the changing conceptions of equality in American history.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Atkinson, A.B. and Stiglitz, J.E. 1980. Lectures on Public Economics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Becker, G. and Tomes, N. 1986. Inequality, human capital, and the rise and fall of families. In Approaches to Social Theory, ed. S. Lindenberg, J. Coleman, and S. Nowak, New York: Russell Sage.
Bergson, A. 1966. Essays in Normative Economics. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Berlin, I. Equality. In Justice and Social Policy, ed. F.A. Olafson, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 131.
Coleman, J. 1975. What is meant by ‘an equal educational opportunity’? Oxford Review of Education 1 (1), 27–9.
Edgeworth, F.Y. 1897. Papers Relating to Political Economy. London: Macmillan for the Royal Economic Society, 1925; New York: B. Franklin, 1963.
Hayek, F.A. 1960. The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, F.A. 1976. Law, Legislation and Liberty, Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978.
Meade, J.E. 1964. Efficiency, Equality and the Ownership of Property. London: Allen & Unwin.
Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia. Oxford: Blackwell; New York: Basic Books.
Parfit, D. 1984. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pigou, A.C. 1938. Economics of Welfare. 4th edn, New York: Macmillan.
Pole, J.R. 1978. The Pursuit of Equality in American History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; Berkeley: University of California Press.
Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press; Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972.
Robbins, L. 1938. Interpersonal comparisons of utility. Economic Journal 48, 635–41.
Schoeck, H. 1969. Envy: A Theory of Social Behavior. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
Simmel, G. 1962. Soziologie. 2nd edn, Munich and Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 1989 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Coleman, J.S. (1989). Equality. In: Eatwell, J., Milgate, M., Newman, P. (eds) Social Economics. The New Palgrave. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19806-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19806-1_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-49529-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-19806-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)