Skip to main content

Free Disposal

  • Chapter
General Equilibrium

Part of the book series: The New Palgrave ((NPA))

  • 264 Accesses

Abstract

If I dislike a commodity, you may have to pay to get me to accept it. But so long as some otherwise non-sated consumer finds this commodity to be desirable, or at least harmless, it could not have a negative price in competitive equilibrium. Likewise, if some firm can dispose of arbitrary amounts of a commodity without using any other inputs or producing any other (possibly noxious) outputs, its price in competitive equilibrium cannot be negative. Therefore competitive equilibrium analysis can be confined to the case of non-negative prices if every commodity is either harmless to someone or freely disposable.

‘I should like to buy an egg, please’ she said timidly. ‘How do you sell them?’ ‘Fivepence farthing for one — twopence for two,’ the Sheep replied. ‘Then two are cheaper than one?’ Alice said, taking out her purse. ‘Only you must eat both if you buy two,’ said the Sheep. ‘Then I’ll have one please’, said Alice, as she put the money down on the counter. For she thought to herself, ‘They mightn’t be at all nice, you know.’

Lewis Carroll, Through the Looking-Glass

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Arrow, K.J. and Debreu, G. 1954. Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econometrica 22, July, 265–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrom, T. 1976. How to discard free disposability — at no cost. Journal of Mathematical Economics 3(2), 131–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debreu, G. 1956. Market equilibrium. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 42, 876–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debreu, G. 1959. The Theory of Value. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debreu, G. 1962. New concepts and techniques for equilibrium analysis. International Economic Review 3, 257–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gale, D. 1955. The law of supply and demand. Mathematica Scandinavica 3, 155–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, O. and Kuhn, H. 1975. A proof of the existence of equilibrium without the free disposal assumption. Journal of Mathematical Economics 2(3), 335–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, L. 1959. On the existence of general equilibrium for a competitive market. Econometrica 27(1), 54–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rader, T. 1972. Theory of General Economic Equilibrium. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, W. 1976. Equilibrium in economies without ordered preferences or free disposal. Journal of Mathematical Economics 3(2), 135–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

John Eatwell Murray Milgate Peter Newman

Copyright information

© 1989 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bergstrom, T. (1989). Free Disposal. In: Eatwell, J., Milgate, M., Newman, P. (eds) General Equilibrium. The New Palgrave. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19802-3_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics