Advertisement

Free Disposal

  • Ted Bergstrom
Part of the The New Palgrave book series (NPA)

Abstract

If I dislike a commodity, you may have to pay to get me to accept it. But so long as some otherwise non-sated consumer finds this commodity to be desirable, or at least harmless, it could not have a negative price in competitive equilibrium. Likewise, if some firm can dispose of arbitrary amounts of a commodity without using any other inputs or producing any other (possibly noxious) outputs, its price in competitive equilibrium cannot be negative. Therefore competitive equilibrium analysis can be confined to the case of non-negative prices if every commodity is either harmless to someone or freely disposable.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Arrow, K.J. and Debreu, G. 1954. Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econometrica 22, July, 265–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bergstrom, T. 1976. How to discard free disposability — at no cost. Journal of Mathematical Economics 3(2), 131–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Debreu, G. 1956. Market equilibrium. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 42, 876–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Debreu, G. 1959. The Theory of Value. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Debreu, G. 1962. New concepts and techniques for equilibrium analysis. International Economic Review 3, 257–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gale, D. 1955. The law of supply and demand. Mathematica Scandinavica 3, 155–69.Google Scholar
  7. Hart, O. and Kuhn, H. 1975. A proof of the existence of equilibrium without the free disposal assumption. Journal of Mathematical Economics 2(3), 335–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. McKenzie, L. 1959. On the existence of general equilibrium for a competitive market. Econometrica 27(1), 54–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Rader, T. 1972. Theory of General Economic Equilibrium. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  10. Shafer, W. 1976. Equilibrium in economies without ordered preferences or free disposal. Journal of Mathematical Economics 3(2), 135–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ted Bergstrom

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations