Skip to main content

Conclusion: A Critical Assessment of Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception

  • Chapter
Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception

Abstract

Merleau-Ponty’s central concern in the Phenomenology of Perception is to prompt us to recognize that objective thought fundamentally distorts the phenomena of our lived experience, thereby estranging us from our own selves, the world in which we live and other people with whom we interact. Such thinking is not confined to a single discipline or to a particular philosophical tradition. On the contrary, not only is it common to the sciences, social sciences and humanities, but it underlies both realism and idealism and feeds on common sense itself. In exposing the bias of objective thought, Merleau-Ponty seeks to re-establish our roots in corporeality and the perceptual world, while awakening us to an appreciation of the inherent ambiguity of our lived experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. G. W. F. Hegel, The Phenomenology of Mind (trans. J. B. Baillie), (New York: Harper & Row, 1967), pp. 162–3, 177, 800ff.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See, for example, Kierkegaard, The Present Age (trans. Alexander Dru), (New York: Harper & Row, 1962) pp. 56ff., 62;

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kierkegaard, Fear and Trembling and The Sickness Unto Death (trans. Walter Lowrie), (New York: Doubleday & Co., 1954) pp. 30ff., 208ff.;

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jaspers, Reason and Existenz (trans. William Earle), (New York: Noonday Press, 1955) pp. 51–77, 137ff.;

    Google Scholar 

  5. Marcel, The Philosophy of Existentialism (trans. Manya Harari), (New York: Citadel Press, 1966) pp 15ff., 46, 94ff.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Merleau-Ponty, The Visible and the Invisible: Followed by Working Notes (ed. Claude Lefort and trans. Alphonso Lingis), Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1968) p. 200.

    Google Scholar 

  7. La prose du monde (ed. Claude Lefori), (Paris: Gallimard, 1969);

    Google Scholar 

  8. English translation by John O’Neill, The Prose of the World (Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1973). For a discussion of the relationship between this work and Merleau-Ponty’s The Visible and the Invisible, see Claude Lefort’s ‘Avertissement’/ ‘Introduction’ to the former. His ‘Foreward’ to The Visible and the Invisible is also very helpful, as is the ‘Translator’s Preface’.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1989 Monika M. Langer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Langer, M.M. (1989). Conclusion: A Critical Assessment of Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception. In: Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19761-3_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics