Conclusion: A Critical Assessment of Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception
Merleau-Ponty’s central concern in the Phenomenology of Perception is to prompt us to recognize that objective thought fundamentally distorts the phenomena of our lived experience, thereby estranging us from our own selves, the world in which we live and other people with whom we interact. Such thinking is not confined to a single discipline or to a particular philosophical tradition. On the contrary, not only is it common to the sciences, social sciences and humanities, but it underlies both realism and idealism and feeds on common sense itself. In exposing the bias of objective thought, Merleau-Ponty seeks to re-establish our roots in corporeality and the perceptual world, while awakening us to an appreciation of the inherent ambiguity of our lived experience.
KeywordsSedimentation Straw Defend Blindness Verse
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.G. W. F. Hegel, The Phenomenology of Mind (trans. J. B. Baillie), (New York: Harper & Row, 1967), pp. 162–3, 177, 800ff.Google Scholar
- 5.See, for example, Kierkegaard, The Present Age (trans. Alexander Dru), (New York: Harper & Row, 1962) pp. 56ff., 62;Google Scholar
- Kierkegaard, Fear and Trembling and The Sickness Unto Death (trans. Walter Lowrie), (New York: Doubleday & Co., 1954) pp. 30ff., 208ff.;Google Scholar
- Jaspers, Reason and Existenz (trans. William Earle), (New York: Noonday Press, 1955) pp. 51–77, 137ff.;Google Scholar
- Marcel, The Philosophy of Existentialism (trans. Manya Harari), (New York: Citadel Press, 1966) pp 15ff., 46, 94ff.Google Scholar
- 12.Merleau-Ponty, The Visible and the Invisible: Followed by Working Notes (ed. Claude Lefort and trans. Alphonso Lingis), Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1968) p. 200.Google Scholar
- 17.La prose du monde (ed. Claude Lefori), (Paris: Gallimard, 1969);Google Scholar
- English translation by John O’Neill, The Prose of the World (Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1973). For a discussion of the relationship between this work and Merleau-Ponty’s The Visible and the Invisible, see Claude Lefort’s ‘Avertissement’/ ‘Introduction’ to the former. His ‘Foreward’ to The Visible and the Invisible is also very helpful, as is the ‘Translator’s Preface’.Google Scholar