Skip to main content

Abstract

Freud’s exploration of the uncanny in his essay of 1919, ‘Das Unheimliche’, remains the single most influential source of thought about this elusive topic. His starting point is an examination of the etymology of the German word unheimlich, which shows that the uncanny is ‘that class of the frightening which leads back to what is known of old and long familiar’ (p. 220).1 Heimlich means belonging to the house, not strange, familiar, tame, intimate, friendly, etc. It also, however, can mean concealed, kept from sight, or withheld from others. The implication of secrecy within an apparently open and friendly term is intensified by the addition of ‘un’ to produce a term for the eerie and frightening, which finally leads Freud to Schelling’s definition of the uncanny: ‘“Unheimlich” is the name for everything that ought to have remained … secret and hidden but has come to light’ (Freud’s italics). Similarly in English, the Oxford English Dictionary shows canny to mean not only ‘cosy’ but also ‘endowed with occult or magical powers’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Sigmund Freud, ‘Das Unheimliche [The Uncanny]’ (1919), Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works 24 vols, ed. and trans. James Strachey (London: The Hogarth Press, 1953) vol. 17, pp. 217–52.

    Google Scholar 

  2. David I. Grossvogel, Mystery and its Fictions (Baltimore, Md, and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hélène Cixous, ‘Fiction and its Phantoms’, New Literary History, 7 (1975) pp. 525–48.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Georges Poulet, ‘Phenomenology of Reading’, New Literary History, 1 (1969) pp. 53–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wolfgang Iser, ‘The Reality of Fiction: a Functionalist Approach to Literature’, New Literary History, 7 (1975) p. 20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tzvetan Todorov, The Poetics of Prose, trans. Richard Howard (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1977) p. 145.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pierre Macherey, A Theory of Literary Production, trans. Geoffrey Wall (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1978) p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wolfgang Iser, The Act of Reading (1976; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1978) pp. 228, 229.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tzvetan Todorov, The Fantastic (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1975) p. 168.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Henry James Sr, Substance and Shadow, in F. O. Matthiessen (ed.), The James Family (New York: Knopf, 1961) p. 165.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1989 Allan Gardner Lloyd-Smith

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lloyd-Smith, A.G. (1989). The Uncanny. In: Uncanny American Fiction. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19754-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics