Abstract
Barthes turned life into language and his alienation in Writing, Play and Pleasure. Barthes’ writings are repetitive: they unfold from the same key words and fundamental patterning structures. Like Yeats, Barthes has his own ex-centric vocabulary of interlocking terms and his own ex-centric mythology. But Barthes’ writings are also always different, always new: they change with the changes in Barthes’ intellectual environment and with the growing boldness of his mental, emotional and sexual striptease.1 Because Barthes translated the languages and conventions of his culture, his readings, his thinking, his ‘art of life’, his habits, his loves, his ‘perversions’, his tenderness and even his own texts into Writing (Écriture), there remains, in his own words, ‘no person behind’ the plural surfaces of his texts. Indeed, one could conceive of writing about Barthes exclusively by putting together a patchwork of citations from Barthes. For instance:
It is my profound conviction (and it is linked to all my work during the past twenty years) that everything is language, that nothing escapes language, and that the whole of society is penetrated by language (GV, 145). Each of us speaks only one sentence which can be interrupted only by death (GV, 101).
‘Atopia. Fiché:I am pinned on a fiche, assigned to a place (intellectual), to residence within a caste (if not a class). Against which only one internal doctrine: that of atopia (a habitation adrift).’ RB by RB
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
The combination of consistency and change in Barthes’ work was noted quite early on. See, for instance, Guy de Mallac and Margaret Eberbach, Barthes ( Paris: Eds universitaires, 1971 );
Louis-Jean Calvet, Roland Barthes: Un Regard Politique sur le Signe ( Paris: Payot, 1973 );
Stephen Heath, Le Vertige du Déplacement ( Paris: Arthème Fayard, 1974 )
and Philip Thody, Roland Barthes: A Conservative Estimate ( London: Macmillan, 1977 ).
For Barthes’ problematical relationship to structuralism, see Sturrock’s essay on Barthes in John Sturrock (ed.) Structuralism and Since (Oxford UP, 1979);
Annette Lavers, Roland Barthes: Structuralism and After ( London: Methuen, 1982 );
Jonathan Culler, Barthes ( London: Fontana, 1983 );
and Howard Felperin, Beyond Deconstruction: The Uses and Abuses of Literary Theory (Oxford: Clarendon P, 1985) esp. pp. 97–103.
This is very much Lukacs’ position too. See Eve Tavor, ‘Art and Alienation: Lukacs’ Late Aesthetic’, Orbis Litterarum 37 (1982) pp. 109–21.
For Barthes’ relationship to the avant-garde in France, see Charles Russell, Poets, Prophets and Revolutionaries: The Literary Avant-Garde from Rimbaud through Post-Modernism (Oxford UP, 1985).
For the close relationship between writers and the university in France and for the ‘intellectual novel’ see Victor Brombert’s classic The Intellectual Hero: Studies in the French Novel 1880–1955 (London: Faber & Faber, 1960).
There are shades of Verlaine and Rimbaud here, both of whom associated homosexuality with crossing the boundary and escaping established limits. See Jerrold Seigel, Bohemian Paris: Culture, Politics and the Boundaries of Bourgeois Life 1830–1930 (New York: Viking, 1986) pp. 252ff.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1989 Eve Tavor Bannet
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bannet, E.T. (1989). Barthes and the Pleasures of Alienation. In: Structuralism and the Logic of Dissent. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19744-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19744-6_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-46948-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-19744-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)