Abstract
John Dowell is an unlikely hero — the least likely, perhaps, of any of the narrators of this study. A cuckold of extraordinary blindness, by all indications a virgin though twelve years married, his personal history begins and ends with the role of nursemaid for women unwilling or unable to return his affection. A catalogue of critics decrying his supposed spiritual as well as physical impotence would be substantial; Mark Schorer, for example, claims that in The Good Soldier ‘passionate situations are related by a narrator who is himself incapable of passion, sexual and moral alike.’2 And John G. Hessler in a more recent article dismisses the possibility of Dowell’s moral growth: ‘His narrative does not represent any progress of the heart, any coming to insight.’3 Yet albeit lame and isolated, Dowell is very much what my first sentence posits — a hero — both in the context of Ford Madox Ford’s other novels and as a narrator who undergoes a moral education, tells his tale as a means of imposing order on chaos, and makes a final heroic gesture of human responsibility and love.
And if everything is so nebulous about a matter so elementary as the morals of sex, what is there to guide us in the more subtle morality of all other personal contacts, associations, and activities?1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Ford Madox Ford, The Good Soldier: a Tale of Passion (New York: Random House, 1955) p. 12. Further page references appear in the text.
Mark Schorer, ‘The Good Soldier: an Interpretation’, in Richard A. Cassell (ed.), Ford Madox Ford: Modern Judgments ( London: Macmillan Press, 1972 ).
John G. Hessler, ‘Dowell and The Good Soldier: the Narrator Re-Examined’, The Journal of Narrative Technique, 9 (spring 1979) p. 115.
John A. Meixner, Ford Madox Ford’s Novels ( Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1962 ) p. 168.
Paul B. Armstrong, ‘The Epistemology of The Good Soldier: a Phenomenological Reconsideration,’ Criticism, 22 (1980).
Ernest Becker, The Denial of Death ( New York: The Free Press, 1973 ) p. 74.
Anthony Winner, Characters in the Twilight: Hardy, Zola, and Chekov ( Charlottesville: University Press of Virgina, 1981 ) p. 25.
Norman Leer, The Limited Hero in the Novels of Ford Madox Ford ( East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 1966 ).
Ford Madox Ford, A Call: the Tale of Two Passions ( London: Chatto & Windus, 1910 ) p. 290.
Ford Madox Ford, An English Girl (London: Methuen & Co., 1907) p. 54. Further page references appear in the text.
Søren Kierkegaard, The Concept of Irony, Lee M. Capel, trans. ( New York: Harper & Row, 1966 ).
Ford Madox Ford, Parade’s End (New York: Alfred Knopf, 1978) p. 629, Ford’s ellipsis.
See Thomas Moser, The Life in the Fiction of Ford Madox Ford (Princeton University Press, 1980).
Cf. Joseph Conrad, ‘Preface’ to The Nigger of the ‘Narcissus’ (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, Page & Co., 1926) p. xiv. ‘My task which I am trying to achieve is, by the power of the written word to make you hear, to make you feel — it is, before all, to make you see. That — and no more, and it is everything.’
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1989 David H. Lynn
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lynn, D.H. (1989). Watching the Orchards Robbed: Dowell and The Good Soldier. In: The Hero’s Tale. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19716-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19716-3_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-19718-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-19716-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)