Advertisement

Introduction

  • Andrew Rutherford

Abstract

The assumption that heroism, like saintliness, is obsolete as an ideal, and that the literature of heroism belongs to the childhood of the individual or of the race, seems typical of current intellectual opinion. Fortitude is out of fashion as a virtue. Indeed the portrayal of courage in the face of adversity, suffering or danger is now positively suspect in the eyes of many readers, whose unexamined ethical assumptions often predetermine their aesthetic judgments on the literature of war (leading them, for example, to see Falstaff’s views on Honour as more normative than Hal’s, or to discount war poetry when it is not antiwar). The deflation of specifically chivalric folly in Don Quixote has been extended to the whole profession of Arms—which Cervantes himself rated higher than that of Letters—and thence to all varieties of courage and self-sacrifice.

Keywords

Aesthetic Judgment Civil Life Psychological Reality Paradise Lost Heroic Poetry 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    The Collected Essays, Journalism and Letters of George Orwell, ed. Sonia Orwell and Ian Angus, vol. ii (London, 1968) pp. 163–4.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arnold Kettle, Introduction to the English Novel, vol. ii (London, 1953), p. 159.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Northrop Frye, Anatomy of Criticism (Princeton, 1957), pp. 33–4.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    The Variorum Edition of the Poems of W. B. Yeats, ed. Peter Allt and R. K. Alspach (New York, 1957), p. 327.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    F. R. Leavis, The Common Pursuit (London, 1952), p. 144.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Frye, op. cit., p. 34.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    The Poems of John Milton, ed. John Carey and Alastair Fowler (London, 1968), p. 1017.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. E. Hulme, Further Speculations, ed. Sam Hynes (Minneapolis, 1955). pp. 109–200.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    L. A. Fiedler, Waiting for the End (London, 1965), p. 30.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Alexander Solzhenitsyn, Warning to the Western World (London, 1976), pp. 20–21. 35.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hulme, op. cit., p. 200.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    The Works of John Ruskin, ed. E. T. Cook and Alexander Wedderburn, vol. xii (London, 1904), pp. 55–6.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Richard Barber, The Knight and Chivalry (London, 1970). p. 60.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Matthew Arnold, ‘On the Modern Element in Literature,’ On the Classical Tradition, ed. R. H. Super (Ann Arbor, 1960), p. 23.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Harry Levin, The Gates of Horn: A Study of Five French Realists (New York, 1963), p. 40.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    E. S. Dallas, The Gay Science, vol. ii (London, 1866), pp. 325–6, 251, 323–4. Cf. Mario Praz, The Hero in Eclipse in Victorian Fiction, trans. Angus Davidson (London, 1956), passim.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rudyard Kipling’s Verse, Definitive Edition (London, 1960), p. 330.Google Scholar
  18. 19.
    W. H. Auden, Spain (London, 1937). p. 11.Google Scholar
  19. 20.
    Vera Brittain, ‘War Service in Perspective,’ in Promise of Greatness, ed. G. A. Panichas (London, 1968), pp. 370–1.Google Scholar
  20. 21.
    Robert Graves, Goodbye to All That (London, 1929), p. 360.Google Scholar
  21. 22.
    Frank Kermode, Modern Essays (London, 1971), p. 83.Google Scholar
  22. 23.
    The Poems of Tennyson, ed. Christopher Ricks (London, 1969), p. 1575.Google Scholar
  23. 24.
    Graham Greene, The Ministry of Fear (London, 1943), pp. 89–90.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Andrew Rutherford 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew Rutherford
    • 1
  1. 1.Goldsmiths’ CollegeUniversity of LondonUK

Personalised recommendations