Skip to main content

The Structure of Post-Reform Politics

  • Chapter
Party and Politics, 1830–1852

Part of the book series: British History in Perspective ((BHP))

  • 8 Accesses

Abstract

In a famous phrase John Bright, the mid-Victorian Radical leader, said of the reform bill that ‘it was not a good bill, though it was a great bill when it passed’.1 What Bright meant was that far more important than the actual terms of the bill were the fact and the manner of its passing. The repeal of the Orders-in-Council and the winning of Catholic emancipation had demonstrated that special interests could achieve their ends by exerting extra-parliamentary pressure on the government and the House of Commons. The reform act demonstrated that the whole of the political nation, backed by the fourth estate and conducting a peaceful campaign that contained a threat within it, could do the same. New rules, so to speak, had come to be applied to the game of politics. Yet the bill itself, even though Lord Grey exaggerated when he called it ‘the most aristocratic measure that ever was proposed in Parliament’,2 wrought no immediate revolution in the conduct of electoral or parliamentary politics. The act’s chief significance was its acknowledgement of urban, middle-class status; but it did not usher in a period of middle-class political ascendancy over, nor even parity with, the landed elite.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. E. Thorold Rogers (ed.), Public Addresses of John Bright, M. P. (London, 1879), p. 29. Bright made the remark during a speech at Rochdale in 1864.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Readers must forgive me for losing this reference.

    Google Scholar 

  3. W. Ferguson, ‘The Reform Act (Scotland) of 1832: Intention and Effect’, Scottish Historical Review, xiv (1966), 105. The increase in the Scottish borough electorate would have been even larger were it not that, the country being poorer than England, the £10 qualification added comparatively fewer people to the electoral rolls.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. R. Dod, Electoral Facts from 1832 to 1853 Impartially Stated (London, 1853).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gash, Politics in the Age of Peel, pp. 438–39.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Peel to H. Hobhouse, July 1831. Peel MSS. Add.Mss. 40,402, ff.98–101.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See, for example, J. A. Phillips, ‘The Many Faces of Reform: the Reform Bill and the Electorate’, Parliamentary History, I (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  8. W. L. Guttsman, The British Political Elite (London, 1965), p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ibid., pp. 38–39.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Morley, The Life of Richard Cobden (London, 1910 edition), p. 517.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gwyn, Democracy and the Cost of Politics, p. 95.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. J. Olney, Lincolnshire Politics, 1832–1885 (Oxford, 1973), p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. le Marchant, Memoir of John Charles, Viscount Althorp, Third Earl Spencer (London, 1876), p. 442.

    Google Scholar 

  14. White, Radicalism and its Results, p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  15. T. J. Nossiter, ‘Elections and Political Behaviour in County Durham and Newcastle, 1832–74’, D.Phil. thesis, Oxford University, 1968, p. 416.

    Google Scholar 

  16. W. I. Jennings, Party Politics: II, The Growth of Parties (Cambridge, 1962), p. 93.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nossiter, ‘Elections’, p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  18. See D. Fraser, Urban Politics in Victorian England (London, 1976), pp. 14–16.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ibid., passim.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ibid., pp. 28–29.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ibid., p. 55.

    Google Scholar 

  22. These figures are extracted from Fraser, ibid., pp. 125, 137.

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. Stewart, The Foundation of the Conservative Party, 1830–1867 (London, 1978), p. 134. Detailed accounts of Conservative electoral and parliamentary organisation may be found in Chapters 6 and 7 of the foregoing and in N. Gash, ‘The Organisation of the Conservative Party, 1832–1846. Part I: The Parliamentary Organisation. Part II: The Electoral Organisation’, Parliamentary History, I (1982) and II (1983). There are no comparable accounts of Whig/Liberal organisation.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stewart, Conservative Party, p. 135.

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. H. Whyte, ‘Daniel O’Connell and the Repeal Party’, Irish Historical Studies, September 1959, p. 306.

    Google Scholar 

  26. A. D. Kriegel (ed.), The Holland House Diaries, 1831–1840 (London, 1977), p. 273.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Earl of Stanhope and E. Cardwell (eds), Memoirs of the Right Honourable Sir Robert Peel (London, 1858), ii, pp. 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  28. F. Raumer, England in 1835 (London, 1836), iii, p. 316.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ibid., i, pp. 77–78.

    Google Scholar 

  30. The best treatment of party development in these years is to be found in D. B. Close, ‘The Formation of a Two-Party Alignment in the House of Commons Between 1832 and 1841’, English Historical Review, April 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bonham to Peel, 25 November 1839. Peel MSS. Add.Mss. 40,427, ff.262–63. Bonham’s figure has been shown to be accurate by modern research (or perhaps the matter should be put the other way around). Of the 567 members who sat in the House of Commons between 1837 and 1841 only 7, by Close’s analysis of divisions, failed to align themselves firmly with one party or the other (ibid., p. 275).

    Google Scholar 

  32. D. Large, ‘The Decline of “the Party of the Crown” and the Rise of Parties in the House of Lords, 1783–1837’, English Historical Review, October 1963, p. 669.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hansard, 3rd Series, lxxxvi, 1404.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Close, ‘Two-Party Alignment’, p. 266.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Phillips, ‘Many Faces of Reform’, p. 123.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Gash, ‘Organisation of the Conservative Party’, I, p. 137.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1989 Robert Stewart

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stewart, R. (1989). The Structure of Post-Reform Politics. In: Party and Politics, 1830–1852. British History in Perspective. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19653-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19653-1_3

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-43626-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-19653-1

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics