Policy, Regulation, and Administrative Guidance



It must seem strange to American readers who are so used to the ascendency of the politician to learn about a government in which the center of gravity for public policy formulation lies in the hands of the professional staffs of government agencies rather than in the legislative body. It is interesting to speculate whether the role of the professional public administrator would be as strong if Japan had not had a single ruling political party for so many years, and if one or more of the other political parties had succeeded in creating viable political agendas in competition with the Liberal Democratic Party. Had that happened, it seems likely that more of the debate, negotiation, and policy decision-making would have taken place outside of the ministries in the Diet or in public forums. Had there been other parties coming into office, it seems likely that the political differences inside the ministries would have shifted and changed much more than they have. While the internal conflicts between factions in or between ministries has been fierce, and has been a force for the consideration of alternative policies, it certainly has not produced any substantial departures from the broad national policy mainstreams laid down by the LDP and successive LDP-dominated Diets and Cabinets.


Land Subsidence Liberal Democratic Party Unfair Labor Practice Affair Bureau Administration Bureau 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. DIMOCK, MARSHALL E., The Japanese Technocracy, New York: Walker/Weatherhill, 1968.Google Scholar
  2. “The Fifth Report on Administrative Reform”, the final report of the Provisional Commission on Administrative Reform, Tokyo: The Institute of Administrative Management, March, 1984.Google Scholar
  3. JOHNSON, CHALMERS, MIT! and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925–1975, Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  4. “Local Autonomy Law”, Tokyo: Jichi Sogo Center, 1986.Google Scholar
  5. “Local Government and Regional Development in Japan”, Tokyo: Jichi Sogo Center, February, 1985.Google Scholar
  6. “Local Public Administration in Japan”, Tokyo: Jichi Sogo Center, 1984.Google Scholar
  7. OKIMOTO, DANIEL I. ed., Japan’s Economy: Coping with Change in the International Environment, Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  8. “The Organization of the Government of Japan”, Tokyo: Institute of Administrative Management, September, 1983.Google Scholar
  9. REED, STEVEN R., Japanese Prefectures and Policymaking, Pittsburgh, Pa.: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  10. VOGEL, EZRA, Japan as Number 1: Lessons for America, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. VOGEL, EZRA, Modern Japanese Organization and Decision-Making, Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Charles F. Bingman 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Government and Business AdministrationThe George Washington UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations