Abstract
The refusal of the Roosevelt administration in 1933–4 to assume any responsibility for the world’s economic health, combined with its reluctance to cooperate with the British Treasury on silver policy in China, encouraged the British government to adopt a unilateral, forward policy in China, one which increasingly placed it in the role of China’s defender against the Japanese. Norman’s influence ensured that the Foreign Office and the Treasury cooperated with the HSBC. When the London Manager of the HSBC (O. J. Barnes) frankly confessed to being ‘out of his depth’ regarding matters of China loans and currency,1 the Government turned once again to Addis, whose unrivalled expertise and experience with China loans and Chinese railways made him indispensable.
‘We are on a very good wicket here and we ought to take full advantage of it.’ — Knatchbull-Hugessen to Cadogan, 3 March 1937
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Norman diary, 4 November 1935, Bank of England. For Leith-Ross’s criticism of the HSBC, see Stephen L. Endicott, ‘British Financial Diplomacy in China: The Leith-Ross Mission, 1935–37’, Pacific Affairs, 46 (1973–74) p. 488.
Nicholas Clifford, ‘Sir Frederick Maze and the Chinese Maritime Customs, 1937–1941’, Journal of Modern History, XXXVII (1965) pp. 18–34. See also Usui Katsumi, The Politics of War’, in Morley (ed.) The China Quagmire, p. 341.
Copyright information
© 1988 Roberta A. Dayer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dayer, R.A. (1988). A New British Initiative in China, 1935–41. In: Finance and Empire. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19592-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19592-3_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-19594-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-19592-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)