Skip to main content

A Question of Partisanship, 1909–22: British Party Politics, the Great War and Ireland

  • Chapter
  • 7 Accesses

Part of the book series: British History in Perspective ((BHP))

Abstract

In 1909 the Liberal and Unionist Parties found themselves in the most irreconcilable political disagreement of their modern political history. This was inspired by a mixture of political issues and political tactics; and the Irish Question was soon gathered up into this mixture, so much that it was quite inseparable from it. For there is a tendency to see Ireland as invading British political space yet again, as disrupting the even tenor of British political ways, as introducing into British politics the savage disagreements characteristic of politics in Ireland. Yet Ireland alone could not have provoked this, despite the fact that the political parties found themselves once again left with Home Rule versus Union as an integral part of their political descriptions. In November 1906 Austen Chamberlain declared that ‘just now, for an Englishman, at any rate, a speech on Home Rule is like flogging a dead horse’.1 The movement of Ireland to the centre of the political stage involved its recognition by the major parties as a public issue essential to the outcome of their party battle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. David Dutton, Austen Chamberlain: Gentlemen in Politics (Bolton, 1985), p. 102.

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. J. Hanham, The Nineteenth Century Constitution (Cambridge, 1969), p. 192.

    Google Scholar 

  3. John Ramsden, Age of Balfour and Baldwin, p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Appendix A.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ronan Fanning, ‘The Irish policy of Asquith’s government and the cabinet crisis of 1910’, in A. Cosgrove and D. McCartney (eds), Studies in Irish History (Dublin, 1979), p. 280, 291–2.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Stephen Koss, Asquith (London, 1985 ed.), pp. 121–2.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bentley, op. cit., p. 355.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Jalland, The Liberals and Ireland (Brighton, 1980), p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Richard Murphy, ‘Faction in the Conservative Party and the Home Rule crisis 1912–14’, History, Vol. 71, No. 232 (1986), pp. 222–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Laffan, The Partition of Ireland, 1911–1925 (Dundalk, 1983), p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bentley, op. cit., p. 365; M. Pugh, The Tories and the People (Oxford, 1985), p. 165.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. and E. Brock, H. H. Asquith: Letters to Venetia Stanley (Oxford, 1982), p. 61.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Murphy, op. cit., p. 232.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ramsden, op. cit., p. 83.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Koss, op. cit., p. 162.

    Google Scholar 

  16. D. G. Boyce, ‘British Opinion, Ireland and the War, 1916–1918’, in Historical Journal, Vol. 17, No. 3 (Sept. 1974), pp. 578–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ibid., p. 586.

    Google Scholar 

  18. D. G. Boyce, ‘British Conservative Opinion, The Ulster Question, and the Partition of Ireland, 1912–1921’, Irish Historical Studies, Vol. XVII, No. 65 (March, 1970), pp. 95–6.

    Google Scholar 

  19. War Cabinet Minutes, 29 July 1918, Cab. 23/7.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tom Jones, Whitehall Diary (ed. K. Middlemas), Vol. III, Ireland, 1918–1925 (London, 1971), pp. 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  21. F. S. Oliver to Lord Selborne, 23 Sept. 1918, MS. Selborne 64/140.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Boyce, ‘British opinion, Ireland and the War’, pp. 591–2.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ramsden, op. cit., pp. 118–19.

    Google Scholar 

  24. D. G. Boyce, Englishmen and Irish Troubles (London, 1972), p. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  25. C. Townshend, Political Violence in Ireland (Oxford, 1983), pp. 325–326.

    Google Scholar 

  26. For a detailed account of the framing of the Government of Ireland Act see Richard Murphy, ‘Walter Long and the making of the Government of Ireland Act, 1919–1920’, Irish Historical Studies, Vol. XXV, No. 97 (May, 1986), pp. 82–96.

    Google Scholar 

  27. C. Townshend, The British Campaign in Ireland, 1919–1921 (London, 1975), p. 191.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Boyce, Englishmen and Irish Troubles, p. 146.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jones, op. cit., p. 166.

    Google Scholar 

  30. John Campbell, F. E. Smith: 1st Earl of Birkenhead (London, 1983), p. 579.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ramsden, op. cit., p. 157.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Dutton, op. cit., p. 172–3.

    Google Scholar 

  33. T. Towey, ‘The Reaction of the British Government to the 1922 Collins—de Valera pact’, Irish Historical Studies, Vol. XXII, No. 85 (March 1980), p. 66.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Patrick Buckland, The Factory of Grievances (Dublin, 1979), pp. 198–205.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Patrick Buckland, A History of Northern Ireland (Dublin, 1981), pp. 48–9, 52–4.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Campbell, op. cit., p. 533.

    Google Scholar 

  37. John Stubbs, ‘The impact of the Great War on the Conservative Party’, in G. Peele and C. Cook (eds), The Politics of Reappraisal (London, 1975), p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1988 D. G. Boyce

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boyce, D.G. (1988). A Question of Partisanship, 1909–22: British Party Politics, the Great War and Ireland. In: The Irish Question and British Politics, 1868–1986. British History in Perspective. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19578-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19578-7_3

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-40598-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-19578-7

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics