Abstract
It was inevitable that the British should have found the aftermath of the war a period of intense strain in the organisation and defence of their worldwide interests. With their economic resources stretched beyond their limit, new commitments at home and abroad and a lowering international landscape, it required strong nerves to be the landlord of so much far-flung, ill-defended and turbulent real estate. But the years beteen 1945 and 1948 were not simply a phase of anxiety and overload in the management of the imperial system. They formed a critical turning point in Britain’s post-war career as an international power. In these years the rough outline of Britain’s last phase as an imperial power took shape; the commitments which dictated her foreign policy until the late 1960s were established; and their validity recognised by the main body of political opinion at home. By 1948 most, though not all, of the huge uncertainties of 1945 had begun to clear away.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
See his remarkable letter to Attlee, 1 Jan. 1947, PREM 8/564, Public Record Office.
P. S. Gupta, Imperialism and the British Labour Movement 1914–1964 (London 1975) pp. 250, 260, 265.
J. R. Seeley, The expansion of England first published in 1883.
Described by Cripps as ‘socialist democracy’. E. Estorick, Stafford Cripps (London, 1949) p. 360.
Cabinet 16 (1946) 18 Feb. 1946, CAB 128/5.
Cabinet 54 (1946) 3 June 1946, CAB 128/5.
R. Clarke, Anglo-American economic collaboration in war and peace 1942–1949, ed. A. Cairncross (Oxford, 1982), p. 72–4.
H. Dalton, High tide and after: memoirs 1945–1960 (London, 1962) pp. 170–1.
Note by Lord President of the Council, C.P. (47) 20, 7 Jan. 1947, CAB 129/16.
Memo by Chancellor of Exchequer 13 Jan. 1947, Cabinet Defence Committee D. O. (47) 9.
Dalton, High tide, pp. 193–8.
Dalton’s Cabinet memos 21 Mar. and 28 May 1947 are printed in Clarke, Economic collaboration.
Ibid., p. 180. Memo by RWB Clarke, 23 July 1947.
Dalton, High tide, p. 259.
Ibid., pp. 241–4.
Cabinet 78 (47) 2 Oct. 1947, CAB 128/10.
Memo by Chancellor of Exchequer, C.P. (48) 35, 5 Feb. 1948, CAB 129/24.
Memo by prime minister, C.P. (45) 44, 1 Sept 1945, CAB 129/1.
Dalton, High tide, p. 101.
Ibid., p. 105.
Ibid.
The memoirs of F. M. The Viscount Montgomery of Alamein (Companion book club edn, London, 1958) p. 400.
Memo by Chiefs of Staff, ‘the defence of the Commonwealth’, 7 Mar. 1947, D.O. (47) 23, CAB 131/4.
Defence Committee 9 (48), 30 April 1948, CAB 131/5.
Montgomery, Memoirs, p. 444.
Memo by Minister of Defence, C.P. (48) 2, 24 Dec. 1947, CAB 129/23.
M. Gowing, Independence and deterrence: Britain and atomic energy 1945–52 (London, 1974) vol. I, pp. 184–5.
C.P. (47) 11, 3 Jan. 1947, CAB 129/16.
The development of British policy in this period can be followed in: A Seal, ‘Imperialism and nationalism in India’, Modern Asian Studies VII, 3 (1973) pp. 321–47;
D. A. Washbrook, The emergence of provincial politics (Cambridge 1976);
C. A. Bayly, The local roots of Indian politics (Oxford, 1975);
B. R. Tomlinson, The political economy of the raj 1914–47 (London, 1979).
For British policy and Indian nationalism in the inter-war years: J. Gallagher and A. Seal, ‘Britain and India between the wars’, Modern Asian Studies, 15, 3 (1981) pp. 387–414;
B. R. Tomlinson, The Indian National Congress and the Raj: the penultimate phase (London, 1976);
R. J. Moore, The crisis of Indian unity (Oxford, 1974);
R. Coupland, The constitutional problem in India (Madras, 1945).
See J. O. Rawson, ‘The role of India in imperial defence beyond Indian frontiers and home waters’, D.Phil. thesis, Oxford, 1976.
The hope of Lord Irwin, Viceroy 1926–31. See C. Bridge ‘Conservatism and Indian reform 1929–1939’, Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History IV, 2 (1976), p. 183.
Gallagher and Seal, ‘Britain and India’, p. 408.
See C. J. Baker, Politics in South India 1920–1937 (Cambridge, 1976), pp. 53–4.
For Irwin’s views, G. Peele, ‘A note on the Irwin declaration’, Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History I, 3 (1973), pp. 331–7;
for that of the Chiefs of Staff in March 1946, N. Mansergh (ed.), The transfer of power 1942–7 (T.P.) V, (London, 1976) pp. 1166–73.
For the view that the Cripps offer was undermined by Churchill and the viceroy, R. J. Moore, Escape from empire (Oxford, 1983), p. 12.
G. Rizvi, Linlithgow and India (London, 1978), pp. 206–7.
Ibid., pp. 237–9. For Attlee’s view, in October 1942, Moore, Escape from empire, p. 4.
Thus the governor of one province told the Viceroy in November 1945 that he had 17 European (i.e. white) civil servants and 19 police officers for 18,000,000 people and 100,000 square miles. Twynam to Wavell, 26 Nov. 1945, T.P. VI, p. 543.
See C.P. (45) 137, 30 Aug. 1945, T.P. VI, p. 181.
P. Moon, Wavell: the Viceroy’s Journal (London, 1973) pp. 165–9.
Cabinet 24 (45) 20 Aug. 1945, CAB 128/1; Cabinet India and Burma Committee (I.B.C.) 4 Sept. 1945, T.P. VI, pp. 211–12.
Ibid.; Wavell to Pethick-Lawrence, 5 Aug. 1945, T.P. VI, pp. 28–30; memo by Cripps, 3 Sept. 1945, T.P. VI, pp. 203–4.
See note by Cabinet Far East Civil Planning Unit, 14 Jan. 1946, T.P. VI, pp. 780–2; note by Pethick-Lawrence on draft Anglo-Indian treaty, 23 Feb, 1946, T.P. VI, p. 1051 ff.
Chequers discussion, 24 Feb. 1946: Cripps’ draft directions for cabinet delegation to India. T.P. VI, pp. 1058, 1062.
Note by Far East Civil Planning Unit, 14 Jan. 1946; draft statement of Indian economic policy, n.d., T.P. VI, pp. 1035–7.
Hollis to Monteath, 13 Mar. 1946, giving views of Chiefs of Staff. T.P. VI, pp. 1167–73.
Wavell to Pethick-Lawrence, 27 Dec. 1945, T.P. VI, pp. 686–7.
See Nehru’s angry letter to Cripps, 27 Jan. 1946, T.P. VI, pp. 852–8.
See remarks on political opinion in the Punjab in Jenkins to Wavell, 9 May 1946, T.P. VII, p. 484.
Nehru to Cripps, 27 Jan. 1946.
S. Gopal, Jawaharlal Nehru vol. 1 1889–1947 (London, 1975) p. 327.
Nehru’s phrase, letter to Cripps, 27 Jan. 1946.
Wavell to Pethick-Lawrence, 6 Nov. 1945, T.P. VI, p. 453.
I.B.C. 7 (45) 19 Nov. 1945, T.P. VI, p. 502.
Wavell to Pethick-Lawrence, 27 Dec. 1945, T.P. VI, p. 688.
Thorne (Home Member, Govt of India) to Abell, 5 April 1946, T.P. VII, p. 151.
Wavell to King George VI, 22 Mar. 1946, T.P. VI, 1233.
Thorne to Abell, 5 April 1946.
Cabinet 55 (46) 5 June 1946, Confidential annex, CAB 128/7.
I.B.C. 1 (46) 14 Jan. 1946, T.P. VI, p. 787.
See e.g. his memo of 18 April 1946, T.P. VII, pp. 303–5.
Ibid.
See Cabinet Delegation to Attlee, 8 May 1946, T.P. VII, p. 455; Moore, Escape from empire, pp. 106–7.
Moon, Wavell, pp. 370–4. ‘I cannot carry Bengal for more than another twelve months’, its governor told Wavell. Ibid. p. 370.
I.B.C. 8 (46) 11 Dec. 1946, T.P. IX, p. 332 ff.
For Wavell’s plan as presented to ministers in a note dated 3 Nov. 1946, Moon, Wavell, p. 386 ff.
I.B.C. 13 (46) 20 Dec. 1946, T.P. IX, pp. 391–4.
Cabinet 108 (46) 31 Dec. 1946, Confidential annex, T.P. IX, pp. 427–31.
See notes by Attlee, n.d. but c. 14 Nov. 1946; Wavell’s comment, Moon, Wavell, p. 398.
See note 69.
Ibid.
Bevin to Attlee, 1 Jan. 1947, PREM 8/564.
Moore, Escape from empire, p. 220; Cabinet 21 (47) 13 Feb. 1947, Confidential annex, CAB 128/10.
Attlee to Mountbatten, 18 Feb. 1947, T.P. IX, pp. 972–4.
Viceroy’s personal report no. 1, 2 April 1947, CAB 127/111 (Sir Stafford Cripps papers).
The provincial assemblies were to decide between partition and unity. Mountbatten thought there was an ‘outside chance’ that Bengal would vote for unity and independence. Viceroy’s personal report 5, 1 May 1947.
But see the discussion in Moore, Escape from empire, pp. 234–280, which suggests that Mountbatten himself was confused and uncertain about the implications of this first plan.
Gopal, Nehru vol. 1, p. 349; Moore, Escape from empire, pp. 276–7.
A deliberate decision by the viceroy. See personal report 17, 16 Aug. 1947, CAB 127/111.
Gopal, Nehru vol. 1, pp. 342–3; Moore, Escape from empire, pp. 239–42.
Ibid. Congress leaders tended to think that ‘Pakistan’ would be so truncated and feeble that its reincorporation into an Indian union would follow sooner or later.
Reinforcing Britain’s military presence in India, the cabinet had concluded gloomily in June 1946 would put security at risk in Palestine and Greece. Cabinet 55 (46) 5 June 1946, Confidential annex, CAB 128/7.
See the account in M. Adas, The Burma delta (Madison, 1974).
See O. H. K. Spate, ‘The Burmese village’, Geographical Review XXXV, 4 (1945), pp. 523–43.
N. Mansergh, Documents and speeches on British Commonwealth affairs 1931–52 II, (London, 1953) p. 762.
Ibid. II, pp. 762–5. These areas formed about 30 per cent of the whole area of Burma and had been excluded from the sphere of Burma’s ministerial government 1937–42.
See F. S. V. Donnison, British military administration in the Far East 1943–46 (London, 1956) pp. 332–4, 356, 365.
Governor of Burma (GoB) to Secretary of State for Burma (SSB), 17 Dec. 1946, CAB 27/128 (Sir Norman Brook papers).
I.B.C. 7 (46), 26 Nov. 1946, PREM 8/412.
GoB to SSB, 23 Jan. 1947; SSB to GoB, 25 Jan. 1947, PREM 8/412.
Cabinet 104 (46), 10 Dec. 1946, CAB 27/128.
GoB to SSB, 7 Dec. 1946; memo by SSB, 9 Dec. 1946; report by Chiefs of Staff, 18 Dec. 1946, all in PREM 8/412. GoB to SSB, 17 Dec. 1946, CAB 27/128.
Cabinet 9 (47) 17 Jan. 1947, PREM 8/412.
Conclusions of H.M.G. and delegation of Burma Executive Council, Cmd 7029 (1947), printed in Mansergh, Documents II, pp.766–70.
See GoB to SSB, 9 June 1947; Governor-General Malaya to Secretary of State for Colonies, 27 June 1947, PREM 8/412.
GoB to SSB, 29 May 1947, PREM 8/412.
Adas, Burma, p. 208; M. Collis, Trials in Burma (London, 1938). Between and cultivated land of Lower Burma was mortgaged to Indian bankers.
See W. G. East and O.H. K. Spate, The changing map of Asia (4th edn, London, 1961) p. 175.
Controversy over the default on debts continued to bedevil Burma’s relations with India long after independence. H. Tinker, Ballot box or bayonet? (London, 1964).
GoB to SSB, 8 June 1947, PREM 8/412.
Report of the Special Commission on the constitution of Ceylon (Donoughmore Commission) Cmd 3131 (1928) p. 31.
Ceylon: report of the commission on constitutional reform (Soulbury commission) Cmd 6677 (1945) pp. 20–3.
S. W. Kirby, The war against Japan II (London, 1958) pp. 107–8.
Ibid. II, p. 109.
Soulbury report, p. 27.
See the British government declaration, 26 May 1943, printed in Mansergh, Documents II, pp. 714–16.
See Soulbury report, 25, pp. 60–4.
Soulbury report, p. 110.
Ibid., p. 60.
Ibid., p. 64.
Ceylon: statement of policy on constitutional reform Cmd 6690 (1945) p. 7.
Round Table 149 (1947) p. 455.
Ibid., pp. 455–7.
Cabinet 44 (47), 6 May 1947, CAB 128/9.
Texts in Mansergh, Documents II, pp. 749–51.
Memo by P. C. Gordon-Walker, C.P. (48) 91, Mar. 1948, CAB 129/26.
Ibid.
Ibid.
Ibid.
Figures quoted in Donnison, British military administration, p. 375.
See T. E. Smith, ‘The immigration and permanent settlement of Chinese and Indians’ in C. D. Cowan (ed.) The economic development of South East Asia (London, 1964), p. 180.
A.J. Stockwell, ‘Colonial planning during World War II: the case of Malaya’, Jnl of Imperial and Commonwealth History 2, 3 (1974), 337.
See memo by Colonial Secretary, C.P. (45) 133, 20 Aug. 1945, CAB 129/1.
See Sir Frank Swettenham, British Malaya (revised edn, London, 1948) p. vi.
Donnison, British military administration, p. 140.
See B. Simandjuntak, Malayan federalism 1945–63 (London, 1969) pp. 39–41.
For the fear of communism, Donnison, British military administration, pp. 381–3.
Simandjuntak, Malayan federalism, pp. 45–9.
Cabinet 48 (47), 20 May 1947, CAB 128/9.
Memo by Chiefs of Staff, 7 Mar. 1947, D.O. (47) 23, CAB 131/4.
Ibid.
The British to show their good faith granted Trans-Jordan independence in 1946, but with a treaty of alliance. The Arab Legion retained its British officers.
In June 1946 there were some 38,000 British troops in the Cairo district alone. Cabinet 58 (46), 7 June 1946, CAB 128/5. This number alone represented a breach of the Anglo-Egyptian treaty of 1936.
Cabinet 7 (46), 22 Jan. 1946, CAB 128/5.
Cabinet 23 (46), 11 Mar. 1946; Cabinet 45 (46), 13 May 1946; both in CAB 128/5.
For the genesis of this offer see E. Lerman, ‘British diplomacy and the crisis of power in Egypt: the antecedents of the British offer to evacuate 7 May 1946’, in K. M. Wilson (ed.) Imperialism and nationalism in the Middle East: the Anglo-Egyptian experience 1882–1982 (London, 1983) pp. 96–122.
Cabinet 42 (46), 6 May 1946, CAB 128/5.
Cabinet 57 (46), 6 June 1946, CAB 128/5.
Ibid.
I.e. Chief of the Imperial General Staff.
Cabinet 58 (46), 7 June 1946, CAB 128/5.
Memoirs, pp. 386–7.
Defence Committee 1 Jan. 1947, CAB 131/4.
See the authoritative study M. J. Cohen, Palestine: retreat from the mandate 1936–1945 (London, 1978).
The best study of these efforts is now M. J. Cohen, Palestine and the great powers 1945–1948 (Princeton, 1982).
The Haganah, the official Jewish underground, opposed the terrorist tactics of the Irgun and the Stern Gang. But official Jewish organisations like the Jewish agency were implicated in a number of violent attacks.
See Cohen, Palestine 1945–48, pp. 126–34.
Cabinet 22 (47), 14 Feb. 1947, CAB 128/9.
See B. Rubin, The Arab states and the Palestine question (Syracuse, 1981) ch. 10 for a recent discussion.
Cabinet 72 (46), 23 July 1946; Cabinet 73 (46), 25 July 1946; CAB 128/6.
Cohen, Palestine 1945–48, pp. 77, 240, 241, 247–8.
Ibid., ch. 10; N. Bethell, The Palestine triangle (London, 1979).
Cohen, Palestine 1945–48, p. 247.
Bevin’s memo for Cabinet, C. P. (47) 259, 18 Sept. 1947, CAB 129/21.
See the gloomy forebodings of the chiefs of staff in the memo for Minister of Defence, C.P. (47) 262, 18 Sept. 1947, CAB 129/21.
Defence Committee 9 (48), 30 April 1948, CAB 131/5.
Memo by Foreign Secretary, D.O. (47) 65, 10 Sept. 1947, CAB 131/4.
See Cohen, Palestine 1945–48, p. 326 ff. But the British were anxious that Trans-Jordan should not affront the other Arab states. Rubin, Arab states, p. 181.
Cabinet 38 (47), 22 April 1947, CAB 128/9.
Copyright information
© 1988 John Darwin
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Darwin, J. (1988). The Crisis of Empire, 1945–48. In: Britain and Decolonisation. The Making of the 20th Century. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19547-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19547-3_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-29258-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-19547-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)