Abstract
Although it is common to draw a sharp distinction between justice and utility, utilitarians themselves vigorously dispute the validity of this antithesis, and claim that utilitarianism can account for the significance of justice as a subordinate ethical and political standard whose importance can be explained by the ultimate ethical principle that the right act is that which maximises overall utility. In contrast, non-utilitarians often ascribe to justice those moral judgements which are routinely used to curb the application of utilitarian reasoning, while some go so far as to define ‘justice’ as a distributive ideal which totally excludes the aggregative goal of bringing about the greatest quantity of good.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1988 Tom D. Campbell
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Campbell, T. (1988). Justice as Efficiency: Posner and Criminal Justice. In: Justice. Issues in Political Theory. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19535-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19535-0_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-36783-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-19535-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)