Skip to main content
Book cover

Justice pp 123–149Cite as

Justice as Efficiency: Posner and Criminal Justice

  • Chapter
  • 122 Accesses

Part of the book series: Issues in Political Theory ((IPT))

Abstract

Although it is common to draw a sharp distinction between justice and utility, utilitarians themselves vigorously dispute the validity of this antithesis, and claim that utilitarianism can account for the significance of justice as a subordinate ethical and political standard whose importance can be explained by the ultimate ethical principle that the right act is that which maximises overall utility. In contrast, non-utilitarians often ascribe to justice those moral judgements which are routinely used to curb the application of utilitarian reasoning, while some go so far as to define ‘justice’ as a distributive ideal which totally excludes the aggregative goal of bringing about the greatest quantity of good.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1988 Tom D. Campbell

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Campbell, T. (1988). Justice as Efficiency: Posner and Criminal Justice. In: Justice. Issues in Political Theory. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19535-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics