Skip to main content

The Protest for Peace: Mass Opposition to Nuclear Arms (1980 to 1986)

  • Chapter
Protest and Democracy in West Germany

Abstract

The rebirth of the West German peace movement was brought on by a special meeting of the NATO foreign and defence ministers in Brussels on 12 December 1979, when the so-called ‘dual track’ decision was taken. The strategic shifts in NATO defence policy had moved from ‘massive retaliation’ in the early 1950s via deterrence by ‘graduated response’, dating from 1957, to the notion of ‘flexible response’ which had been the agreed position since 1967. The concept of ‘theatre nuclear war’ had emerged, with Europe as the stage for what was euphemistically termed a ‘limited nuclear exchange’. This policy was now substantially confirmed by a wide-ranging modernisation programme of weapons systems which was to involve the stationing of 572 American medium-range nuclear missiles in Western Europe, to be deployed from 1983 onwards unless, in the intervening period, the necessity for doing so was obviated by agreements on arms limitations. Nachrüstung was now the order of the day. By this term was understood in the first instance a ‘reply’ to the Soviet SS-20s by matching weapons but, in effect, this programme inaugurated an extensive updating of the entire military arsenal. Since more than a third of the missiles (108 Pershing IIs and 96 cruise missiles) were destined for West German territory and given the key role played in the decision by the Federal Chancellor — for it was Helmut Schmidt who, in a speech delivered in London at the end of October 1977, had first publicly mooted the superiority of the Soviet nuclear potential — it is hardly surprising that reaction to this policy in the Federal Republic was particularly vehement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. See G. Schmid, ‘Zur Soziologie der Friedensbewegung und des Jugendprotestes. Strukturmerkmale — Inhalte — Folgewirkungen’, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, Vol. 24 (19 June 1982) pp. 15–30.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Krefelder Initiative — Entstehung und Ziele, ed. D. Lattmann (Cologne, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Reprinted in Für eine bessere Republik, ed. H. Billstein and K. Naumann (Cologne, 1981) pp. 46/7.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cf. Bastian’s letter to the Süddeutsche Zeitung (11 July 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  5. See ’Es geht, es geht... ‘Zeitgenössische Schriftsteller und ihr Beitrag zum Frieden, ed. B. Engelmann (Munich, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  6. See H. J. Benedikt, ‘Auf dem Weg zur Friedenskirche? Entstehung und Erscheinungsformen der neuen Friedensbewegung in der evangelischen Kirche’, in Die Neue Friedensbewegung, ed. R. Steinweg (Frankfurt, 1982) pp. 227–44.

    Google Scholar 

  7. K. Sontheimer, ‘Die Friedensbewegung in der evangelischen Kirche. Ethik Kontra Machtpolitik’, Der Monat, No. 237 (1983) p. 190.

    Google Scholar 

  8. For details of this rally and information on the organisations that took part see Bonn 10.10.81, ed. Aktion Sühnezeichen/Friedensdienste and Aktionsgemeinschaft Dienst für den Frieden (Bornheim, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  9. The statistics were as follows; 10 October 1981, Bonn, 300000; 24 October 1981, Rome, 150000 and London, 70000; 25 October 1981, Paris 50 000; 28 October 1981, Helsinki, 150 000; 15 November 1981, Madrid, 500 000 and Athens, 300000; 28 October 1981, Amsterdam, 350000 (cf. W. von Bredow, ‘Zusammensetzung und Ziele der Friedensbewegung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland’, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, Vol. 24 (19 June 1982) p. 3).

    Google Scholar 

  10. See G. Braunthal, ‘West German Trade Unions and Disarmament’, Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 73, No. 1 (1958) pp. 82–99, and R. Steinweg, ‘Die Bedeutung der Gewerkschaften für die Friedensbewegung’, in Steinweg (ed.), Die Neue Friedensbewegung, pp. 189–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Einheit, Organ der IG. Bergbau und Energie, August 1981, p. 5 and tageszeitung, 3 September 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  12. tageszeitung, 21 September 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cf. the surveys conducted by the EMNID Institute in September/October 1981, whose findings are reproduced in W. Harenberg,’ sicherer Platz links von der SPD? Die Wähler der Grünen in der Demoskopie’, in Die Grünen. Regierungspartner von morgen?, ed J. H. Mettke (Reinbek, 1982) p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cf. L. Knorr, Geschichte der Friedensbewegung in der Bundesrepublik (Cologne, 1983) p. 171.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 10 October 1981 and Rheinische Merkur, 9 October 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Radio interview with Deutschlandfunk (11 October 1981), quoted in Parl-Polit-Pressedienst (22 October 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Die Welt, 20 October 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schmidt’s speech in the Bundestag of 9 October 1981 was reproduced in Stuttgarter Nachrichten (13 October 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  19. See E. P. Thompson, ‘Notes on Exterminism, the Last Stage of Civilisation’, New Left Review, No. 121 (May/June 1980) pp. 3–31.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cf. Bredow, ‘Zusammensetzung und Ziele der Friedensbewegung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland’, p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cf. P. K. Kelly,’ schwerter zu Pflugscharen — ohne Systemgrenzen’, in Wohindenn wir?, ed. M.Coppik and P.K.Kelly (Berlin, 1982)pp. 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  22. See L. Lemhöfer, ‘Zögernder Aufbruch aus dem Kalten Krieg’. Die katholische Kirche und die bundesdeutsche “neue Friedensbewegung” ‘, in Steinweg (ed.), Die Neue Friedensbewegung, pp. 245–57.

    Google Scholar 

  23. G. Bastian, ‘Bevor der Wettlauf ausser Kontrolle gerät’, Vorwärts, 18 December 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  25. See C. S. Gray and K. Payne, ‘Sieg ist möglich’, Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik, Vol. 25, No. 12 (1980) pp. 1502–9.

    Google Scholar 

  26. The text of the ‘Friedensmanifest 82’ is printed in München April ′82. Ostermärsche. SPD-Parteitag, Demonstrationen, ed. M. Hoppe (Olehing, 1982) pp. 94/5.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Der Stern, 9 June 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  29. General Anzeiger, 12 June 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Both quoted in Die Zeit (30 October 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Cf. H. Albertz, ‘Wir sind doch ein besetztes Land’, in Wie souverän ist die Bundesrepublik?, ed. D. Hoffmann-Axthelm and E. Knödler-Bunte (Berlin, 1982) pp. 115–19.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cited in Die Zeit (30 October 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Both quoted in the Guardian (12 October 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  34. For an assessment of the relationship between nationalism and the peace movement, see D. Diner, ‘Die “nationale Frage” in der Friedensbewegung. Ursprünge und Tendenzen’, in Steinweg (ed.). Die Neue Friedensbewegung, pp. 86–112 and W. von Bredow, ‘Friedensbewegung und Deutschlandpolitik. Herkömmliche und neuartige Aspekte einer Themenverbindung’, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, Vol. 46 (19 November 1983) pp. 34–46.

    Google Scholar 

  35. H. Albertz, ‘Von der Nation — und von Wichtigerem’, in In Letzter Stunde, ed. W. Jens (Munich, 1982) p. 139.

    Google Scholar 

  36. See P. Brandt and H. Ammon, ‘Das deutsche Dilemma: die Frage nach der Nation und die “deutsche Frage”’, in Die Linke und die nationale Frage: Dokumente zur deutschen Einheit seit 1945, ed. P. Brandt and H. Ammon (Reinbek, 1981) and ‘Patriotismus von links’, in Die deutsche Einheit kommt bestimmt, ed. W. Venohr (Bergisch Gladbach, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  37. E. Michels, Auswertung der 2. bundesweiten Friedenswochen (unpublished manuscript, Berlin, 1982); cf. R.A. Steinbrecher, ‘Mögliche Aktionsformen für die Freidensarbeit’, in Frieden in Deutschland, ed. H. A. Pestalozzi et al. (Munich, 1982) pp. 202–8.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Cf. the results of opinion polls published and analysed in Der Spiegel (29 August 1983), in Die Zeit (7 October 1983) and in Kommentar über sieht (Bundespresseamt, 24 October 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  39. P. Glotz, Die Arbeit der Zuspitzung (Berlin, 1984) p. 46 and p. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Quoted in Neue Ruhr Zeitung (29 March 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  41. W. Brandt, Rede in Bonner Hofgarten am 22. Oktober 1983 (copy in the Presse-und Dokumentationsstelle des Deutschen Bundestages, Bonn).

    Google Scholar 

  42. tageszeitung, 19 June 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  43. E. Eppler, ‘Die Friedensbewegung ist noch lange nicht am Ende. Aber Grund zum Innehalten und Nachdenken’, Vorwärts, 27 October 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  44. The survey, conducted by Marplan for the Guardian, is analysed in D. Fairhall and M. Linton, ‘Europe and Defence — A Guardian Survey’, Guardian (16 December 1987) p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1988 Rob Burns and Wilfried van der Will

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Burns, R., van der Will, W. (1988). The Protest for Peace: Mass Opposition to Nuclear Arms (1980 to 1986). In: Protest and Democracy in West Germany. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19521-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics