Skip to main content

The Protest for Peace: Opposition to Remilitarisation and Nuclear Weapons (1950 to 1969)

  • Chapter
Protest and Democracy in West Germany

Abstract

When in October 1983 over half a million West Germans assembled in the Bonn Hofgarten to be addressed by such renowned public figures as Willy Brandt, Petra Kelly and Heinrich Boll, the spectacular nature of this event was such that the West German peace movement, for the first time the recipient of wide-scale international attention, was seen to have established itself as a significant new force within German politics. In fact, the German peace movement of the 1980s has historical roots which go back not just to the early years of the Federal Republic but to the last decade of the previous century. Even before then the German philosophy of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, notably Kant (Zum ewigen Frieden — On Perpetual Peace), Herder (Briefe zur Beförderung der Humanität — Letters Concerning the Furtherance of Humanism, and Jean Paul (Kriegserklärung gegen den Krieg — Declaration of War Against War), had demonstrated a persistent fascination with the idea of peace. That it was at the end of the nineteenth century when this philosophical interest first assumed organisational form is undoubtedly related to the emergence at that time of a German imperialism which, fuelled by the reactionary and militarist traditions of the Prussian Junker class, pursued from the outset a foreign policy based on aggression and aiming at aggrandisement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. K. Jaspers, Wohin treibt die Bundesrepublik? (Munich, 1966) p. 91.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Protocol of the Berlin (Potsdam) Conference, 1 August 1945, reprinted in Documents on Germany 1944–1961, Committee on Foreign Relations United States Senate (New York, 1968) p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Protocol of the Proceedings of the Yalta Conference, 11 February 1945, ibid., p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Protocol of the Berlin (Potsdam) Conference, 1 August 1945, ibid., p. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See G. Wettig, Entmilitarisierung und Wiederaufrüstung in Deutschland 1943–1955 (Munich, 1967) p. 209.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Baring, Aussenpolitik in Adenauers Kanzlerdemokratie (Munich/ Vienna, 1969) p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See, for example, the notorious interview with Adenauer in The Cleveland Plain Dealer (3 December 1949) in which he deemed it ‘not only right but necessary’ for a European army to be formed with German contingents in it; cf. also G. Wettig, Entmilibarisierung und Wiederaufrüstung in Deutschland 1945–1955, pp. 244–6.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See an interview in Süddeutsche Zeitung, 1 January 1960 and a television interview on 5 May 1965, quoted in F. Krause, Antimilitaristische Opposition in der BRD 1949–55 (Frankfurt, 1972) p. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. Adenauer, Erinnerungen 1945–1953 (Stuttgart/Hamburg, 1965) p. 387.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See the discussion of these polls in K. A. Otto, ‘Der Widerstand gegen die Wiederbewaffnung der Bundesrepublik. Motivstruktur und politischorganisatorische Ansätze’, in Unsere Bundeswehr?, ed. R. Steinweg (Frankfurt, 1981) pp. 60–70.

    Google Scholar 

  11. B. Hochstein, Die Ideologie des Überlebens (Frankfurt/New York, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Es geht um die Freiheit (Hanover (Neuer Vorwärts-Verlag) n.d. ( 1951 )), pp. 3/4.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Niemöller’s letter was published in Frankfurter Presse, 6 October 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cf. Dokumentation der Zeit. Informations-Archiv, ed. Deutsches Institut für Zeitgeschichte (Berlin, 1952) No. 19 and H. E. Jahn, Für und gegen den Wehrbeitrag (Cologne, 1957) p. 264.

    Google Scholar 

  15. The Nauheim Circle, in the post-war years the best-known advocate of a politically neutral Germany, was founded by Professor Ulrich Noack on 25 May 1948 and its membership, comprising politicians, scientists and intellectuals, embraced various shades of party-political opinion. (Noack himself was a member of the CSU, from which he was expelled in July 1951.)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Since changes to the Grundgesetz require a two-thirds majority in the Bundestag, the result of the 1953 election was of particular importance, for it enabled the government to pass those constitutional amendments, such as that allowing for military service, which facilitated rearmament.

    Google Scholar 

  17. F. Erler, Soll Deutschland rüsten? — Die SPD zum Wehrbeitrag (n.d.) p. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schumacher’s speech is reproduced in 20 Jahre Bundesrepublik Deutschland in Dokumenten, ed. M. Hereth (Munich, 1969) pp. 81–5.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Protokoll der Verhandlungen des Parteitages der SPD vom 20. bis 24. Juli 1954 in Berlin (Bonn, n.d. (1954)) p. 141.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sozialdemokratische Zeitung, July 1951, No. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Neuer Vorwärts, 31 December 1954, quoted in U. Löwke, (Für den Fall, dass...’, SPD und Wehrfrage, 1945–1955 (Hanover, 1969) p. 207; Proceedings of the Deutscher Bundestag, 27.2.1955, quoted in E. Dietzfelbinger, Die westdeutsche Friedensbewegung 1948 bis 1955 (Cologne, 1984) p. 181.

    Google Scholar 

  22. See Krause, Antimilitaristische Opposition in der BRD 1949–55, p. 178.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Quoted in T. Pirker, Die SPD nach Hitler (Munich, 1965) p. 206.

    Google Scholar 

  24. See Dietzfelbinger, Die westdeutsche Friedensbewegung 1948 bis 1955, pp. 191–3.

    Google Scholar 

  25. See G. Gaus, Staatserhaltende Opposition, oder: Hat die SPD kapituliert? (Reinbek, 1966) p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cited in Dietzfelbinger, Die westdeutsche Friedensbewegung 1948 bis 1955, p. 187.

    Google Scholar 

  27. T. Pirker, Die blinde Macht, Vol. 2 (Munich, 1960) pp. 148/9.

    Google Scholar 

  28. See E. Riechert, Die Radikale Linke (Berlin, 1969) p. 71.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cf. J. F. Dulles, ‘Challenge and Response in United States Policy’, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 36, No. 1 (October 1957) pp. 25–43 (in particular p.31ff).

    Google Scholar 

  30. See L. Knorr, Geschichte der Friedensbewegung in der Bundesrepublik (Cologne, 1983) pp. 91/2.

    Google Scholar 

  31. See the text of a press conference, given by Adenauer on 5 April 1957, in Dokumentation zur Deutschlandfrage, Vol. 1, ed. H. von Siegler (Bonn/ Vienna/Zurich, 1961) p. 612.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cf. Riechert, Die Radikale Linke, p. 79.

    Google Scholar 

  33. ‘Kampf dem Atomtod’, in Vaterland, Muttersprache. Deutsche Schriftsteller und ihr Staat von 1945 bis heute, ed. K. Wagenbach et. al. (Berlin, 1979) pp. 144/5.

    Google Scholar 

  34. H. K. Rupp, Ausserparlamentarische Opposition in der Ära Adenauer (Cologne, 2ndedn 1980) pp. 149.

    Google Scholar 

  35. H.W. Richter,’ schweigen bedeutet Mitschuld’, in Vaterland, Muttersprache, pp. 145–7.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rupp, Ausserparlamentarische Opposition in der Ära Adenauer, p. 191.

    Google Scholar 

  37. A comprehensive account of the Easter March movement is given in K. A. Otto, Vom Ostermarsch zur APO. Geschichte der ausserparlamenta-rischen Opposition in der Bundesrepublik 1960–70 (Frankfurt/New York, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  38. See A. Büro, ‘Die Entwicklung der OM-Bewegung als Beispiel für die Entfaltung von Massenlernprozessen’, in Friedensanalysen, ed. Hessische Stiftung Friedens-und Konfliktforschung (Frankfurt, 1977) p. 72.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ibfd., p. 67 and p. 64.

    Google Scholar 

  40. See J. Wienecke and F. Krause, Unser Marsch ist eine gute Sache (Frankfurt, 1982) p. 101.

    Google Scholar 

  41. See Otto, Vom Ostermarsch zur APO, pp. 140–4.

    Google Scholar 

  42. For details of that meeting see ibid., pp. 118–24.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ibid., pp. 164–71.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Although there are no official statistics for the 1968 Easter March, Wienecke and Krause ( Unser Marsch ist eine gute Sache, p. 132) record the figure of 300 000, i.e. twice the number of those participating in the 1967 demonstrations.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Büro, ‘Die Entwicklung der OM-Bewegung als Beispiel für die Enfaltung von Massenlernprozessen’, pp. 51/2.

    Google Scholar 

  46. H. Schulte, ‘Die Friedensbewegung der fünfziger und sechziger Jahre’, in Christen für die Abrüstung. Informationsmaterial, No. 1 (1982) p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Cf. U. Jäger and M. Schmidt-Vöhring, ’Wir werden nicht Ruhe geben...’, (Tübingen, 1982) p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1988 Rob Burns and Wilfried van der Will

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Burns, R., van der Will, W. (1988). The Protest for Peace: Opposition to Remilitarisation and Nuclear Weapons (1950 to 1969). In: Protest and Democracy in West Germany. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19521-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics