Skip to main content
  • 130 Accesses

Abstract

The Chernobyl accident compelled many countries of the world to question their nuclear power programs. In Yugoslavia, for example, which participates in many of the meetings of the CMEA countries, there have been massive protests against nuclear power (the country has one nuclear plant in operation). In 1987, the Yugoslavian Socialist Youth Federation began a campaign against nuclear power plants, while a leading sociologist in the country stated: “That Yugoslavia did not learn anything after Chernobyl is evident in the fact that it has not discontinued its nuclear program.”1 Other European countries, such as Sweden and Austria, have also rejected nuclear power as a viable option. The Soviet reaction, however, has always been that it was man rather than the machine that was at fault in the nuclear accident, and that nuclear power remains the safest and most viable of Soviet energy options.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. International Atomic Energy Agency, “Convention on Early Notification of a Nuclear Accident, 26 September 1986,” cited in Survival (May-June 1987): 268–71.

    Google Scholar 

  2. N.F. Lukonin, “Nuclear Power After Chernobyl’: Current Problems and Future Indices of Nuclear Power Plants,” International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna. 28 September-2 October 1987, IAEA-CN-48/269 p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. David Marples, “The Kuznetsk Alternative,” Radio Liberty Research Bulletin RL 413/87, October 21, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1988 David R. Marples

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marples, D.R. (1988). The Nuclear Power Debate. In: The Social Impact of the Chernobyl Disaster. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19428-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19428-5_8

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-48198-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-19428-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics