Skip to main content

Dependency, Postsemantics, Paradigm

  • Chapter
Mind, Language, Machine
  • 34 Accesses

Abstract

The Chomskyan revolution, which replaced the old paradigm that dictated the taxonomic study of natural language with another that proposed a theoretical methodology (of ‘hidden laws’, in Searle’s phrase) for interpreting the data accumulated by that study, has undoubtedly changed forever man’s view of his language and directly or indirectly occasioned much of the theory and research I have been discussing. That paradigm has stirred controversies that extend, like Chomsky’s speculations, far beyond questions about the details of transformational grammar. But, as has been seen, it has serious inadequacies. They raise important questions about the MLM metaphor and encourage speculation about the post-Chomskyan paradigm, which increasingly will be integrated with AI theory and tested by AI research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See Robin Campbell and Roger Wales, ‘The Study of Language Acquisition’, in New Horizons in Linguistics, ed. John Lyons (Baltimore, Md.: Penguin Books, 1970), pp. 242–60.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Judith Greene, Psycholinguistics: Chomsky and Psychology (New York: Penguin Books, 1972), p. 196.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Joan Bresnan, ‘A Realistic Transformational Grammar’, in Linguistic Theory and Psychological Reality, ed. Morris Halle, Joan Bresnan, and George A. Miller (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1978), pp. 2, 59.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Richard A. Hudson, Arguments for a Non-Transformational Grammar (Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press, 1976), pp. 2, 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wallace L. Chafe, Meaning and the Structure of Language (Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press, 1970), pp. 40, 54, 55.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1988 Michael L. Johnson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Johnson, M.L. (1988). Dependency, Postsemantics, Paradigm. In: Mind, Language, Machine. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19404-9_36

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics