Skip to main content

Representation, Elections and Voting Behaviour

  • Chapter
Modern Politics and Government
  • 164 Accesses

Abstract

We have seen that political parties and pressure groups represent interests, attitudes and values in the political system, but there is often confusion over what is meant by the term ‘representation’. Adolf Hitler once said that he had the greatest claim to be called representative of his people, and this claim must be based on different grounds than those of liberal democratic systems which demand periodic and competitive elections. The British House of Commons is said to be a representative assembly, but this does not mean that it mirrors the geographical, class, sex, age and religious distribution of the British population.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. See A. H. Birch, Representative and Responsible Government (London, 1964) pp. 13–17 for a discussion on the different usages of the term.

    Google Scholar 

  2. The Social Contract (Everyman’s Library ed., London, 1913) p. 78.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Quoted in S. H. Beer, Modern British Politics, 2nd ed. (London, 1969) p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Quoted in A. D. Lindsay, The Essentials of Democracy, 2nd ed. (Oxford, 1935) p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  5. For a fuller account of the demands of the Levellers, especially those contained in the debates with the army leaders in 1647, see A. S. P. Woodhouse (ed.), Puritanism and Liberty (London, 1938).

    Google Scholar 

  6. See B. Bailyn, Ideological Origins of the American Revolution (Cambridge, Mass., 1967) chs 6 and 7.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See Birch, Representative and Responsible Government for an outline of British theories of representation. For the development of the American liberal consensus, see L. Hartz, The Liberal Tradition in America (New York, 1955).

    Google Scholar 

  8. See R. Hoftstadter, The American Political Tradition (London, 1962) pp. 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Quoted in R. A. Dahl, Democracy in the United States (Chicago, 1976) p. 73.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. S. Mill, Representative Government (Everyman’s Library ed., London, 1910) pp. 280–90.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. A. Dahl, A Preface to Democratic Theory (Chicago, 1956).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ibid. p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ibid. p. 50.

    Google Scholar 

  14. An example of the work of the English idealists in the twentieth century is to be found in Lindsay, The Essentials of Democracy.

    Google Scholar 

  15. For an account of these early socialist theories, see G. Lichtheim, The Origins of Socialism (London, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  16. The Communist Manifesto (Penguin Books ed., Harmondsworth, 1967) p. 92.

    Google Scholar 

  17. G. Ionescu, The Politics of the European Communist States (London, 1967), points out that in theory ‘communist states are said to be direct and not representative democracies’, but that ‘in practice it has not worked out at all like that’ (p. 29).

    Google Scholar 

  18. L. G. Churchward, Contemporary Soviet Government, 2nd ed. (London, 1975) pp. 226–7.

    Google Scholar 

  19. See D. Butler and A. Ranney (eds), Referendums. A Comparative Study, Practice and Theory, (Washington, 1978). The Polish government’s defeat in the 1987 referendum provides a dramatic exception.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Time Magazine, 16 February 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  21. See L. Lewis et al., An American Melodrama (London, 1969) pp. 230 and 509.

    Google Scholar 

  22. See T. H. White, Breach of Faith. The Fall of Richard Nixon (London, 1975). Also G. Liddy, Will (London, 1980); John Dean, Blind Ambition, The White House Years (London, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  23. See M. Harrop and W. L. Miller, Elections and Voters. A Comparative Introduction (London, 1987) pp. 21–4.

    Google Scholar 

  24. I. Crewe, ‘Tories Prosper From a Paradox’, The Guardian, 16 June 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  25. See M. P. Wattenburg, The Decline of American Political Parties 1958–80 (Harvard, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  26. A. Downs, An Economic Theory of Democracy (New York, 1957).

    Google Scholar 

  27. I. Budge and D. Farlie, Explaining and Predicting Elections (London, 1983) p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  28. For American evidence see N. Nie et al., The Changing American Voter (Cambridge, Mass., 1974). There is a wealth of new studies of voting behaviour particularly in Britain: see A. Heath et al., How Britain Votes (Oxford, 1985); R. Rose et al., Voters Begin to Choose (London, 1986); P. Dunleavy et al., British Democracy at the Crossroads (London, 1985); D. Robertson, Class and the British Electorate (Oxford, 1984). See also H. Himmelweit et al., How Voters Decide (London, 1981) for some support for the rational voter approach. For an overview sec Harrop and Miller, Elections and Voters.

    Google Scholar 

  29. For a discussion of perceptions of ‘left’ and ‘right’, see D. Butler and D. Stokes, Political Change in Britain, 2nd ed. (London, 1974) pp. 323–37.

    Google Scholar 

  30. See V. Wright, The Government and Politics of France (London, 1983) 2nd ed. Appendix 8.

    Google Scholar 

  31. See E. C. Ladd, ‘On Mandates, Realignments, and the 1984 Presidential Election’, Political Science Quarterly, 100, 1 (Spring, 1985) pp. 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. ITN/Harris Exit Poll, The Independent, 13 June 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  33. See P. Whiteley, The Labour Party in Crisis (London, 1983) pp. 94–107. See also, Dunleavy et al., British Democracy at the Crossroads, pp. 121–46.

    Google Scholar 

  34. See Heath et al., How Britain Votes, pp. 13–44.

    Google Scholar 

  35. See A. Kriegel, The French Communists. Profile of People (Chicago, 1972). Of course, both the 1985 French elections and the Italian elections saw a weakening of the support for the Communist parties, the French far more seriously than the Italian.

    Google Scholar 

  36. See A. R. Ball and F. Millard, Pressure Politics in Industrial Societies (London, 1986), pp. 211–16, for a discussion of the problems of calculating and defining church membership.

    Google Scholar 

  37. See D. McKay, American Politics and Society, 2nd ed. (Oxford, 1985) p. 105. Also see C. T. Husbands, ‘Race and Gender’, in Developments in British Politics, 2nd ed., H. Drucker et al. (eds) (London, 1986) pp. 304–13.

    Google Scholar 

  38. For a discussion of ‘age cohorts’, see Butler and Stokes, Political Change in Britain, p. 62.

    Google Scholar 

  39. L. G. Edinger, West German Politics (New York, 1986) p. 114.

    Google Scholar 

  40. See K. Newton, ‘Mass Media’, in Developments in British Politics, pp. 314–17.

    Google Scholar 

  41. See A. Abramowitz, ‘The Impact of a Presidential Debate on Voter Rationality’, American Journal of Political Science, 22 (August 1978) pp. 680–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. See Glasgow University Media Group, Really Bad News (London, 1983). This is the third book in the series, the first being published in 1976. See also P. Dunleavy, ‘Fleet Street: its Bite on the Ballot’ New Socialist, January 1985, pp. 24–6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1988 Alan R. Ball

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ball, A.R. (1988). Representation, Elections and Voting Behaviour. In: Modern Politics and Government. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19347-9_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics