Advertisement

Classification of Governments

  • Alan R. Ball

Abstract

Attempts to produce a classification of political institutions can be dated back to the beginnings of the study of political science. Aristotle made one of the earliest attempts to classify government structures. He distinguished between states ruled by one person, by the few and the many — monarchy, aristocracy and mixed government. His intention was not only to describe but to evaluate and thus he extended his classification scheme to their ‘perverted’ forms, which he labelled tyranny, oligarchy and democracy. He realised, however, that these types did not exist in their pure forms, thus noting that classification in political science is a search for ‘ideal’ types.1

Keywords

Political Party Political System Political Institution Civil Liberty Liberal Democracy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    The Politics of Aristotle, trans. with an introduction by Ernest Barker (Oxford, 1946) particularly bk iv.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    See J. W. Allen, A History of Political Thought in the Sixteenth Century (London, 1957) ch. 8.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baron de Montesquieu, The Spirit of the Laws, trans. T. Nugent (London, 1966) bk ii:, ch. 1, p. 8.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ibid., bk ii, ch. iii, p. 15.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ibid., bk viii, ch. xix, p. 122.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ibid., bk viii, ch. xvi, p. 120.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    See chapter 1.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. A. Dahl, Modern Political Analysis, 4th ed. (Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1964) p. 30.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America (London, 1968) i, 345.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    See especially S. M. Lipset, The First New Nation (London, 1963).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Barrington Moore, Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy (London, 1967).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    See G. A. Almond and G. B. Powell, Comparative Politics, System, Process and Policy, 2nd ed. (Boston, Mass., 1978).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    B. Crick, In Defence of Politics (London, 1964) p. 56.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    There are many examples of différent typologies: see Maurice Duverger’s distinction between pluralist systems and monolithic systems, The Idea of Politics (London, 1966) pp. 92–5; See also S. E. Finer, Comparative Government (London, 1970), and B. Crick, Basic Forms of Government: A Sketch and a Model (London, 1973).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. Blondel (ed.), Comparative Government (London, 1969) p. xxxviii.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    C. Friedrich and Z. Brzezinski, Totalitarian Dictatorship and Autocracy, 2nd ed. (Massachusetts, 1965) p. 22.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    For wide ranging discussion of the usefulness of the concept of ‘totalitarianism’, see, inter alia, C. J. Friedrich, B. R. Barber, and M. Curtis, Totalitarianism in Perspective: Three Views (London, 1969); L. Schapiro, Totalitarianism (London, 1972); R. Burrowes, ‘Totalitarianism: the Revised Standard Edition’, World Politics, vol. 21, no 2 (Jan. 1969) pp. 272–89; R. Cornell (ed.), The Soviet Political System (Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1970).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    For a discussion of the problem of classifying radical military regimes see J. Markakis and M. Waller (eds.), ‘Military Marxist Regimes in Africa’, The Journal of Communist Studies, Vol. 1, Nos 3 and 4, Sept/Dec, 1985.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    For a discussion of aspects of federalism, see K. C. Wheare, Federal Government, 4th ed. (Oxford, 1963), and W. H. Riker, Federalism: Origin, Operation, Significance (Massachusetts, 1964); also, Ivo Duchacek, Comparative Federalism (New York, 1970).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    For an examination of Soviet federalism, see E. Goldhagen (ed.), Ethnic Minorities in the Soviet Union (Praeger, NY, 1968).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    For the impeachment process in the United States, see R. Berger, Impeachment. The Constitutional Problems (New York, 1974).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    See the essays by R. Neustadt in The British Prime Minister, ed. A. King (London, 1969).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Archives Européennes de Sociologie, i, 1 (1960).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    P. Avril, Politics in France (London, 1969) p. 18.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    See particularly the categories used by S. E. Finer, Comparative Government (London, 1970).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Alan R. Ball 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alan R. Ball
    • 1
  1. 1.Portsmouth PolytechnicUK

Personalised recommendations