Skip to main content

The Motion Picture Patents Company, 1908–14

  • Chapter
Hollywood and the Box Office, 1895–1986
  • 18 Accesses

Abstract

Thomas Edison, as we know, had from the earliest days of the cinema aimed for exclusive control of the business. As the years passed and his lawsuits increased in number and expense, expansion of the industry was hindered both by the drain on capital and the want of a stable business environment. Eventually, by 1907, Edison managed to subdue the smaller companies; but litigation against his most powerful rival was proving inconclusive, not least because the American Mutoscope and Biograph Company had designed its own camera in a manner sufficiently different from Edison’s that, while it accepted compatible film stock, it escaped his patents.1 Biograph was making sufficient profit from its film production to be able to afford to contest Edison’s lawsuits. As late as 1907 it continued to stand out against him, while most other companies had capitulated and come under his licence. In 1908 Edison changed tactics and proposed to Biograph a truce and the pooling of interests to their mutual profit. Biograph accepted, and in September the Motion Picture Patents Company was formed, embracing not only Biograph and Edison, but all those that had previously come into the Edison orbit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Kristin Thompson, Exporting Entertainment (London: British Film Institute, 1985) pp. 2–12; Anderson, ‘The Role of the Western Film Genre’, p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Reese V. Jenkins, Images and Enterprise (London: Johns Hopkins UP, 1975) p. 285.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ibid., pp. 123–6; Ralph Cassady, Jr., ‘Monopoly in Motion Picture Production and Distribution: 1908–1915’, Southern California Law Review, 32 (Summer 1959) pp. 355–8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tom Gunning, ‘Weaving a Narrative: Style and Economic Background in Griffith’s Biograph Films’, Quarterly Review of Film Studies 6, 1 (Winter 1981) p. 15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Robert H. Stanley, The Celluloid Empire (New York: Hastings House, 1978) p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1988 Kenneth John Izod

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Izod, J. (1988). The Motion Picture Patents Company, 1908–14. In: Hollywood and the Box Office, 1895–1986. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19324-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics