Abstract
Whatever is thought of its literary merits,1 it would be hard not to acknowledge that What Is To Be Done? (1863)2 is amongst the most famous and influential books in the Russian Language. It has been called ‘a Bible for all advanced Russian women with aspirations toward independence’,3 and its impact can be said to have gone far beyond the literary or even intellectual world more generally: ‘In its political effects, as a fundamental text of Russian socialism, this novel has probably changed the world more than any other.’4 This is not an exaggerated claim; Lenin himself noted:
Chernyshevsky’s novel is too complicated, too full of ideas, to understand and evaluate at an early age …. But after the execution of my brother, knowing that Chernyshevsky’s novel was one of his favourite books, I set about reading it properly and sat over it not just a few days but whole weeks. It was only then I understood its depth. It’s a thing that can fire one’s energies for a lifetime.5
Certainly, the novel, written in the Peter and Paul Fortress before the author was exiled to Siberia, made a profound impression on Chernyshevsky’s contemporaries and became one of the central texts in the debates around the ‘woman question’.6 In turn, it prompted a series of anti-Nihilist novels and other writings for the next decade or so.7
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
All references to the text are to N. G. Chernyshevsky, Chto Delat? (Izdatelstvo ‘Khudozhestvennaya Literatura’, Moscow, 1969), pp. 27–426.
See ibid., as well as Freeborn, This Rise of the Russian Novel p.133, and C. Moser, Antinihilism in the Russian Novel of the 1860s (The Hague, 1964).
D. Offord, ‘The Causes of Crime and the Meaning of Law: Crime and Punishment and Contemporary Radical Thought’, in M. V. Jones and G. M. Terry (eds), New Essays on Dostoevsky (Cambridge, 1983), pp. 41–66. I am indebted to Christopher R. Pike for drawing my attention to the last work.
M. Berman, All That Is Solid Melts Into Air: The Experience of Modernity (London, 1983), pp. 173–286.
K. Mochulsky, Dostoevsky: His Life and Works (Princeton, 1967), especially pp. 250–1.
For a discussion of this, see E. Lampert, Sons Against Fathers: Studies in Russian Radicalism and Revolution (Oxford, 1965). Paradoxically the newest of the ‘new people’, Rakhmetov, is an aristocrat.
Boris Eykhenbaum notes the novelty of Tolstoy’s treatment of marriage as a beginning and not the end of the real plot in Family Happiness (1859). See B. M. Eykhenbaum, ‘On Tolstoy’s Crises’, in R. E. Matlaw (ed.), Tolstoy. A Collection of Critical Essays (New Jersey, 1947), p. 53.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1988 Joe Andrew
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Andrew, J. (1988). Nikolay Chernyshevsky and the Real Day. In: Women in Russian Literature, 1780–1863. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19295-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19295-3_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-19297-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-19295-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)