Abstract
That Gogol had difficulty in dealing with women, both in life and in fiction, is no secret.3 However, in a consideration of women in Russian fiction one can hardly bypass a writer of such importance. He has acquired many reputations: as founder of the so-called ‘natural school’, as a champion of the oppressed, as a symbolist, a religious writer, a proto-Surrealist and many more such labels have been attached to him and his mysterious, complex works.4 Despite his own paradoxical sexuality and the general absence of serious portraits of women in his work, much recent interest has been devoted (in the West at least) to problems of sexuality in his fiction, culminating in an extended psychoanalytical study of one short work and an elaborate hypothesis as to his own psycho-sexual motivations.5 It is against this critical background that any survey of Gogol’s female characters must be located. Nevertheless, as the two quotations above are intended to suggest, the image of women that emerges from his fiction was not merely conservative, patriarchal and misogynist, but positively and specifically medieval in orientation.
All witchcraft comes from carnal lust which is in women insatiable.1
In these recurrent fantasies the obscene details are often identical, and their identity sheds some light on the psychological connection between persecuting orthodoxy and sexual prurience. The springs of sanctimony and sadism are not far apart.2
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Ibid., p.181, from H. R. Trevor-Roper, The European Witch-Craze of the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries and Other Essays (New York, 1969), p. 127.
For a discussion of Gogol’s life and works from this perspective, see especially S. Karlinsky, The Sexual Labyrinth of Nikolai Gogol (Cambridge, Mass. and London, 1976).
See Karlinsky for an extended discussion of Gogol’s sexuality, and D. Rancour-Laferriere, Out from under Gogol’s Overcoat: A Psychoanalytical Study (Ann Arbor, 1982).
Reference to this work is to the following edition, N. V. Gogol, Sobraniye Sochineny v Semi Tomakh (Moscow, 1967), Vol. VI, pp. 711.
See J. B. Woodward, The Symbolic Art of Gogol: Essays on his Short Fiction (Ohio, 1982), pp. 10–12.
For references to this work, see N. V. Gogol, Sobraniye Khudozhestvennykh Proizvedenyy v Pyati Tomakh (Moscow, 1960), Vol. I, pp. 53–31.
For the background to these changes, see C. Proffer, The Simile and Gogol’s ‘Dead Souls’ (The Hague, 1967), pp. 183–200.
R. Poggioli, ‘Gogol’s Old-Fashioned Landowners: An Inverted Eclogue’, in Indiana Slavic Studies, Vol. III (1963), pp. 54–75
R. Sobel, ‘Gogol’s Rome: A Final Draft for a Utopia’, in Essays in Poetics, 5. 1, (1980), pp. 48–70.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1988 Joe Andrew
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Andrew, J. (1988). Nikolay Gogol: The Russian ‘Malleus Maleficarum’. In: Women in Russian Literature, 1780–1863. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19295-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19295-3_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-19297-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-19295-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)