Abstract
Let us begin with a summary of our findings.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
A. Pospelov and S. Postinikov, ‘Po povodu statei tt. starogo rabotnika i Al. Klyueva’, in ZT no. 32 (November 1910), pp. 11–15 (here p. 14).
For more on the propaganda output of urban organisations see Eiter, ‘Organizational Growth and Revolutionary Tactics’, pp. 85–7.
Johnson, Peasant and Proletarian, p. 159.
Weber, Peasants into Frenchmen, pp. 278–85.
See McKay, Pioneers for Profit, p. 262.
Radkey, The Agrarian Foes of Bolshevism, p. 53. See also Lane, The Roots of Russian Communism, p. 42.
Koenker, Moscow Workers, p, 358.
Engelstein, ‘Moscow in the 1905 revolution: A Study in Class Conflict and Political Organization’, PhD thesis, Stanford CA, 1976. (See Engelstein in bibliography.)
‘Tekstil’shchiki v revolyutsii 1905–07gg’, in Proletariat v revolyutsii 1905–07gg (Moscow and Leningrad, 1930).
Koenker, Moscow Workers, p. 205.
See above, p. 107.
See, for example, B. V. Levanov, Iz istorii bor’by bolshevistskoi partii protiv eserov v gody pervoi russkoi revolyutsii, p. 106; and K. V. Gusev, Partly a eserov — ot melkoburzhuaznogo revolyutsionarizma k kontrrevolyutsii, p. 52.
William G. Rosenberg, ‘The Russian Municipal Duma elections of 1917’, p. 144, (‘SR strength in the European provincial capitals appears especially impressive…’).
It should be emphasised here that there is no intention to imply in what follows, either that support for the PSR was drawn exclusively from the ranks of migrant workers, or that support can be explained solely in terms of workers’ connections with the land or the peasant community.
Joan M. Nelson, Migrants, Urban Poverty and Instability in Developing Nations (Cambridge, MA, 1969); here p. 7.
Haimson, ‘The Problem of Social Stability in Urban Russia, 1905–1917’.
Daniel Brower, ‘Labor Violence in Russia in the Late Nineteenth Century’, Slavic Review, no 41, 3(1982) pp. 417–32; here p. 418.
Robert C. Fried, ‘Urbanization and Italian Politics’, in Journal of Politics, 29, no. 3 (1967), pp. 505–34; here p. 527.
See above, chapter 5.
Olga Crisp, ‘Labour and Industrialization in Russia’, p. 378.
Johnson, Peasant and Proletarian, p. 158.
See for example, Wayne A. Cornelius, Politics and the Migrant Poor in Mexico City (Stanford, 1975).
Bonnell, ‘Radical Politics and Organized Labour’, p. 283.
Alejandro Portes, ‘Political Primitivsim, Differential Socialization and Lower-Class Leftist Radicalism’, American Sociological Review vol. 36 (1971), pp. 820–35; here p. 832.
On the influence of the local environment, see the chapter on political culture in David Mandel, The Petrograd Workers and the Fall of the Old Regime (London: Macmillan, 1983).
Koenker, Moscow Workers, pp. 187, 191.
Fried, quoted Nelson, Access to Power, p. 119.
Koenker, Moscow Workers, p. 192.
E. Kabo, Ocherki rabochego byta, pp. 35–9, 47–54, 54–63, 93–98, 103–11.
R. E. Zelnik, ‘Russian Bebels: An Introduction to the Memoirs of Semen Kanatchikov and Matvei Fisher’, in Russian Review, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 249–90; no. 4 (1976) pp. 417–47; here p. 424. (Extracts from the Kanatchikov memoir can also be found in V. E. Bonnell (ed.), The Russian Worker. Life and Labor under the Tsarist Regime, pp. 36–71).
Copyright information
© 1988 Christopher Rice
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rice, C. (1988). Conclusion. In: Russian Workers and the Socialist-Revolutionary Party through the Revolution of 1905–07. Studies in Soviet History and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19252-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19252-6_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-19254-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-19252-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)