Skip to main content
  • 22 Accesses

Abstract

Consider an Economics student presented with the following mathematical relationships:

$$x = \alpha z + \beta $$
((1.1))
$$q = \bar q$$
((1.2))
$$z = x + y$$
((1.3))
$$w = x + q$$
((1.4))
$$w = z$$
((1.5))

and suppose he or she is told that equations (1.1)–(1.5) imply:

$$\frac{{{{\text{d}}_z}}}{{{{\text{d}}_{\bar q}}}} = \frac{1}{{1 - \alpha }}(\alpha \ne 1)$$
((1.6))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further reading

  • Katouzian (1980), Stewart (1979) and Blaug (1980) all deal with questions of economic methodology. Much of Koopmans (1957) is concerned with the role of mathematics in economics. Popper (1959) and Kuhn (1970) are classic references on scientific methodology generally. Covick (1974) satirises model building while Leijonhufvud (1981) likens economists to a primitive tribe for whom models are sacred objects.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1988 Donald A.R. George

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

George, D.A.R. (1988). Models, theories and method. In: Mathematical Modelling for Economists. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19238-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics